比较尿液检验中试纸法与镜检法的临床效果

To Compare the Clinical Effect of Test Paper Method and Microscopy Method in Urine Test

目的:观察并比较在尿液检验中使用镜检法与试纸法的临床效果。方法:共选取2018年4月~2019年11月在本医院接受尿液检验的患者112例为观察对象。以随机抽签结果将所有患者平均分成两组,即对照组(n=56,试纸法)和观察组(n=56,镜检法)。将两组患者白细胞与红细胞的检查结果进行对比。结果:和对照组进行对比,观察组患者的白细胞阳性率与红细胞阳性率均更高,但没有明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:在尿液检验中使用镜检法与试纸法均具有一定效果,可为临床诊断与治疗提供科学的数据支持,但其阳性率均不高,可将二者联合应用,以此提高检查的准确性。

Objective:To observe and compare the clinical effect of microscopy and test paper in urine test.Methods:A total of 112 subjects were selected,all of them were patients who received urine test in our hospital from April 2018 to November 2019.All patients were randomly divided into two groups,the control group(n=56,test paper method)and the experimental group(n=56,microscopy method).White blood cells and red blood cells of the two groups were compared.Results:Compared with the control group,the positive rate of white blood cells and red blood cells in the experimental group were higher,but there was no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion:Both microscopy and test paper are effective in urine test,which can provide scientific data support for clinical diagnosis and treatment,but their positive rate is not high,so they can be combined to improve the accuracy of urine test.