期刊文献+

检察权的自由理念 被引量:3

The Free Concept of Prosecutorial Power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 检察权是分权制衡的制度产物,而权力的均衡和相互制约体现出防止极端权力侵害"真正的幸福生活"的道德关切。自由作为分权制衡的正当性依据,以"做法律所许可的一切事情的权利"的定义扩充了防止侵害的道德内容并提升了其理论高度。每个人的意志自由、道德自律则为分权制衡做道德论证,但自由是排除外在的强制或障碍而能够按自己的意志进行行为,是发挥独特个性的自我实现,以拥有自由意志为前提。自由的道德完满离不开制度的助推,惟有倚靠道德主体人的实践,其中尤应以权力实践为引领表率,检察实践当然不能自外于这一使命承担。自由能为矫正正义的检察制度实践确立道德关注,能为信仰法治的检察权力实践供给道德能量,能为谨业防恶的检察职业实践唤醒道德动机。自由为鉴照指引检察实践更好向善,以臻于完美的理想范型适配分权制衡的生成意义,为检察权启引个人先在的思维逻辑,为检察权划限基本权利的莫近禁脔,为检察权导正守护参与的功用机能。 Prosecutorial power is the product of a system of decentralized checks and balances,the balance and mutual restraint of power reflect the moral concern of preventing extreme power from infringing on"true happy life".Freedom is the legitimate basis for the separation of powers and checks and balances,and the definition of"the right to do everything permitted by law"expands the moral content of preventing infringement and raises its theoretical height.Each person’s freedom of will and moral self-discipline are moral arguments for the separation of powers and checks and balances,but freedom is to exclude external coercion or obstacles and be able to act according to one’s own will.It is the self-realization of a unique personality and the premise of having free will.Free moral perfection is inseparable from the support of the system.It only depends on the practice of the moral subject,especially the practice of power as a leading example.Of course,prosecutorial practice cannot be undertaken outside of this mission.Freedom can establish moral concern for the practice of corrective justice prosecutorial system,can provide moral energy for the practice of prosecutorial power that believes in the rule of law,and can awaken moral motivation for the professional practice of guarding against evil.Freedom is the reference to guide the prosecutorial practice to be better and better,to adapt to the generation meaning of decentralized checks and balances with a perfect ideal paradigm,to inspire the individual’s prior thinking and logic for the prosecutorial power,and to limit the basic rights of the prosecutorial power,nearly forbidden,for the prosecutorial power to guide and protect the function of participation.
作者 李建华 屈煜 Li Jianhua;Qu Yu(Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004;The Department of Philosophy,Central South University,Changsha 410012)
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期102-110,90,158,共11页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 国家哲学社会科学重大项目“中国政治伦理思想通史”(16ZDA103)。
关键词 检察权 自由 分权 制衡 prosecutorial power freedom decentralization checks and balances
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献126

  • 1曹天予,苏俊斌.2050年爱因斯坦还会是物理学的英雄吗?[J].科学文化评论,2005,2(6):111-116. 被引量:1
  • 2尚洁.从“威尼斯之谜”看共和国的政治体制[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2006,19(5):680-686. 被引量:8
  • 3[法]邦雅曼·贡斯当.古代人的自由与现代人的自由[M].阎克文,刘满贵.上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
  • 4[英]亚当·斯密著,郭大力等译.《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》(下卷),北京:商务印书馆,1974年版,第27页.
  • 5[美]科恩.论民主[M].聂崇信,朱秀贤译.北京:商务印书馆.2007.
  • 6Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan , Simon&Schuster Inc, New York. , 1997,P159.
  • 7Robert Maynard Hutchins, Great Books of The Western World,Volume. 43. On Liberty, by, John StuartMill, Encyclop Aedia Britannica, Inc, 1980, P. 299.
  • 8Abraham H. Maslow, Motivation And Personality, second edition , Harper & Row,Publishers, New York, 1970, P. 46.
  • 9Robert Maynard Hutchins, Great Books of The Western World ,Volume. 43. On Liberty, by, John StuartMill, Encyclop Aedia Britannica, Inc, 1980, P. 162.
  • 10Isaiah Berlin: Four Essay on Liberty, Oxford University Press, 1969, P128.

共引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部