摘要
目的气管插管患者通过PDCA模式进行循环管理,评价PDCA循环管理的作用。方法本院在2016年7月—2019年7月,一共收治了60例进行气管插管的患者,以随机数字表法分为观察组(n=30)和对照组(n=30),对照组患者利用常规方法进行干预,观察组在对照组的基础上,通过PDCA模式进行护理干预,比较两组患者的非计划性拔管率,并对比两组患者的护理总满意度。结果观察组患者的非计划拔管率为3.3%(1/30);观察组患者的护理总满意度为96.7%(29/30),显著优于对照组患者(P<0.05)。结论气管插管治疗的患者通过PDCA循环管理模式进行护理干预,可以有效降低患者的非计划性拔管率。
Objective To evaluate the effect of PDCA circulation management in patients with endotracheal intubation.Methods From July 2016 to July 2019,60 patients with endotracheal intubation were randomly divided into observation group(n=30)and control group(n=30).Patients in control group were intervened by conventional methods,while patients in observation group were intervened by PDCA model on the basis of control group.The unplanned extubation rate of two groups of patients was compared and compared Total nursing satisfaction.Results the unplanned extubation rate of the observation group was 3.3%(1/30);the total nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 96.7%(29/30),which was significantly better than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion nursing intervention through PDCA cycle management mode can effectively reduce the unplanned extubation rate of patients with endotracheal intubation.
作者
万林
杨玉珍
WAN Lin;YANG Yuzhen(Nursing Department,Chongqing Southeast Hospital,Chongqing 400038,China;Department of Anesthesiology,Chongqing Southeast Hospital,Chongqing 400038,China)
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2021年第1期191-194,共4页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
PDCA
气管插管
非计划性拔管率
护理满意度
循环管理
对比
PDCA
tracheal intubation
unplanned extubation rate
nursing satisfaction
circulation management
comparison