摘要
为制约二审法院以一审遗漏必须参加诉讼的当事人为由任意将案件发回重审,有必要明确何为必须参加诉讼的第三人。依据《行政诉讼法》及相关解释,行政诉讼第三人可以分为必要参加诉讼第三人与普通参加诉讼第三人。把握必要参加诉讼第三人的判断标准可借助类型化分析的方法,将必要参加诉讼第三人区分为原告型与被告型。原告型必要参加诉讼第三人的判断标准为保护规范理论,被告型必要参加诉讼第三人原则上是作出行政行为的行政机关。但是经过行政复议的案件,复议机关维持原行政行为的,二者均不能转化为第三人,只能以共同被告身份参加诉讼。
In order to restrict the court of second instance to retry the case arbitrarily on the grounds that the party who must participate in the proceedings is omitted in the first instance,it is necessary to clarify what the third party must participate in the proceedings.According to the Administrative Procedure Law and relevant interpretations,the third party in administrative proceedings can be divided into the requisite third party and the third party who is ordinary to participate in the proceedings.To grasp the judgment standard of the third party who must participate in the lawsuit,we can divide the third party into plaintiff type and the defendant type by the method of typological analysis.The judgment criterion standard of the plaintiff type necessary to participate in the litigation is the protection norm theory,and the defendant type necessary to participate in the litigation is in principle the executive branch of the administrative act.However,in a case that has undergone administrative reconsideration,if the reconsideration organ maintains the original administrative act,neither of them can be transformed into a third party and they can only participate in the proceedings as a co-defendant.
作者
李会勋
魏彩丽
LI Hui-xun;WEI Cai-li(College of Humanities and Law,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,China)
出处
《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
2020年第4期72-78,共7页
Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(20YJC820022)
中国博士后基金面上项目(2017M612238)
山东省社科规划研究专项(20CFZ130)。
关键词
行政诉讼第三人
必要参加诉讼第三人
保护规范理论
the third party in administrative litigation
the requisite third party
the theory of protection norm