期刊文献+

基于团队学习的中医实验课程学习评价研究:以《实验针灸学》为例 被引量:2

On learning evaluation of TCM experimental courses based on team learning mode: taking the Experimental Acupuncture for example
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估和比较以问题为基础的学习(problem-based learning,PBL)和Sandwich教学在《实验针灸学》中的学生学习过程体验。方法61名学生分别随机分为PBL学习(n=30)和Sandwich学习(n=31)两组。两组学生完成学习过程评价和学习喜爱偏好的调查问卷,并通过课后小测验评价其学习效果。结果PBL学习和Sandwich学习两组学生都对讨论参与度、多角度讨论、学习体验、团队效率等方面表示肯定。PBL学习的最大优点是讨论积极,各抒己见;最大缺点是讨论方向太多。Sandwich学习的最大优点是反复讨论,很充分;最大缺点是重复讨论时间不够。相较于传统教学,学生大部分都是喜欢PBL学习(63%)或Sandwich学习(76%)。课后小测验成绩Sandwich学习高于PBL学习。结论PBL和Sandwich教学合理运用到中医实验课程能让学生有很好的学习体验。 Objective To assess and compare students'learning experiences between the problem-based learning(PBL)and Sandwich approach in the Experimental Acupuncture course.Methods Sixty-one students were randomized into PBL group(n=30)and Sandwich approach group(n=31).Students'feedback following completion of one lesson teaching was collected by questionnaire and a survey of learning preferences.A quiz after class was used to evaluate their learning effect.Results The students in two groups both affirmed the participation in discussion,multi-angle discussion,learning experience and team efficiency.The greatest advantage of PBL was to discuss actively and express their opinions freely,whereas the biggest drawback was too many discussion directions.The greatest advantage of Sandwich approach was repeated discussions,whereas the biggest drawback was insufficient time for repeated discussions.In comparison with traditional teaching methods,most students prefered to PBL(63%)or Sandwich approach(76%).The score of after-class quiz in Sandwich approach was higher than that in PBL.Conclusion The integration of PBL and Sandwich approach applied into TCM experimental course can give students better learning experiences.
作者 毛慧娟 许瑜函 魏建子 汪丽娜 秦梦 瞿筱逸 刘胜 Mao Huijuan;Xu Yuhan;Wei Jianzi;Wang Lina;Qin Meng;Qu Xiaoyi;Liu Sheng(College of Acumox and Tuina,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China;Teacher Development Center,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China)
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2020年第12期1388-1392,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金 上海中医药大学课程建设项目 (2019SHUTCM037、2020SHUTCM050)。
关键词 团队学习 三明治教学 以问题为基础的学习 Team learning Sandwich approach Problem-based learning(PBL)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1郑秀敏.“三明治”式教学法在高等教育中的应用[J].高教探索,2004(2):46-48. 被引量:51
  • 2布兰思福特,布朗,科金.人是如何学习的:大脑、心理、经验及学校[M].程可拉,孙亚玲,王旭卿译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.
  • 3世界教育报告World Education Report.http://www.unesco.org/education/information/wer.
  • 4国际21世纪教育委员会.教育:财富蕴藏其中[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1996..
  • 5Robertson J. Beyond the 'research/teaching nexus': exploring the complexity of academic experience[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2007,32(5):541-556.
  • 6Griffiths R. Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines[J]. Studies in higher education,2004,29(6):709-726.
  • 7Biggs JB. Student approaches to learning and studing[R]. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research,1987.
  • 8KADMONM, et al. Das Sandwich-Prinzip - Einf ii hrung inLemer zentrierte Lehr-Lemmethoden in der Medizin[J]. Zeitschriftf ii r Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, 2008,102(10): 628-633.
  • 9FINNJ D. Withdrawing from school [J]. Review of EducationalResearch, 1989, 59(2): 117-142.
  • 10FINNJ D, COX D. Participation and withdrawal amongfourth-grade pupils [J]. American Educational Research Journal,1992, 29(1): 141-162.

共引文献62

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部