摘要
程序性事项在司法发展的进程中受到越来越多的关注和重视。现有法律文本已明确将程序性事项作为刑事诉讼的证明对象。而《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》第401条规定之一为,在法庭审理中不存在争议的程序性事实可以不必提出证据进行证明。该条规定与《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》第64条第9项的关系为何,当无争议的程序性事实存在违法的情形该如何处理,在以审判为中心改革的大背景下,明确该项制度应该如何更好地运行具有十分重要的意义。
Procedural matters have attracted more and more attention in the course of judicial development.The existing legal texts have clearly regarded procedural matters as the object of proof in criminal proceedings.However,one of the provisions of article 401 of the criminal procedure rules of the people’s procuratorate is that procedural facts that are not disputed in court proceedings can be proved without evidence.What’s the relationship between the supreme people’s court of the criminal procedure law of the People’s Republic of China apply explain and the article 64,9,when programmed uncontested facts exist illegal situation how to deal with,in the context of trial-centered reform,it is of great significance to make clear how the system should work better.
作者
曲春玉
Qu Chunyu(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《上海公安学院学报》
2020年第6期79-87,共9页
Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词
刑事证明对象
程序性事项
审判中心
Object of Criminal Proof
Procedural Matters
Centralism Judgment