期刊文献+

审判中心视角下刑事程序性事项自认研究 被引量:1

Study on the Self-admission of Criminal Procedural Matters from the Perspective of Trial Center
下载PDF
导出
摘要 程序性事项在司法发展的进程中受到越来越多的关注和重视。现有法律文本已明确将程序性事项作为刑事诉讼的证明对象。而《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》第401条规定之一为,在法庭审理中不存在争议的程序性事实可以不必提出证据进行证明。该条规定与《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉的解释》第64条第9项的关系为何,当无争议的程序性事实存在违法的情形该如何处理,在以审判为中心改革的大背景下,明确该项制度应该如何更好地运行具有十分重要的意义。 Procedural matters have attracted more and more attention in the course of judicial development.The existing legal texts have clearly regarded procedural matters as the object of proof in criminal proceedings.However,one of the provisions of article 401 of the criminal procedure rules of the people’s procuratorate is that procedural facts that are not disputed in court proceedings can be proved without evidence.What’s the relationship between the supreme people’s court of the criminal procedure law of the People’s Republic of China apply explain and the article 64,9,when programmed uncontested facts exist illegal situation how to deal with,in the context of trial-centered reform,it is of great significance to make clear how the system should work better.
作者 曲春玉 Qu Chunyu(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《上海公安学院学报》 2020年第6期79-87,共9页 Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词 刑事证明对象 程序性事项 审判中心 Object of Criminal Proof Procedural Matters Centralism Judgment
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献47

共引文献195

同被引文献35

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部