期刊文献+

台湾乡村“社区营造”内涵变迁与高校课程建设的关联性——以淡江大学为例 被引量:8

The Relevance of the Change of the Connotation of Rural “Community Empowerment” in Taiwan and the Construction of College Curriculum: Take Tamkang University as an Example
原文传递
导出
摘要 台湾乡村社区营造的经验,对于探索乡村振兴路径具有借鉴价值与启发意义。本文以淡江大学为例,从社区营造课程建设的角度梳理台湾乡村社区营造内涵演化的轨迹,认为其内涵提升经历了乡村环境美化、社区认同、人本溯源三个阶段,其脉络与"社区营造服务"课程建设和发展轨迹相辅相成,从而肯定了高校产学研对于台湾乡村社区营造内涵建设和深化的意义,以此为乡村振兴和社区重塑与高校互动的创新思维带来启发。 The experience of rural community empowerment in Taiwan is of reference value and inspiration to explore the path of rural revitalization. Taking Tamkang University as an example, from the perspective of curriculum construction, this paper sorts out the trajectory of the connotation evolution of Taiwan rural community empowerment. It believes that the enhancement of connotation has gone through three stages: beautification of the countryside, community recognition, and human origin, and the context is consistent with the course construction and development track of "Community Building Service". Therefore, it affirmed the significance of university teaching and research to the connotation construction and deepening of the Taiwan rural community empowerment. And this experience will inspire the creative thinking that rural revitalization and community reshaping interact with universities.
作者 杨昌新 黄瑞茂 Yang Changxin;Huang Ruimao
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期62-70,共9页 Urban Planning International
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(51708117) 福建省自然科学基金项目(2020J01901)资助。
关键词 乡村社区营造 内涵变迁 关联性 淡江大学 课程建设 产学研 乡村振兴 Rural Community Empowerment Connotation Changes Relevance Tamkang University Curriculum Construction Production-Teaching-Research Rural Revitalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1Clapham D. Rational Planning and Politics: The Example of Local Authority Corporate Planning[J]. Policy and Politics, 1984, (1): 31-52.
  • 2Pierson J, Worley C. Housing and Urban Regeneration Policy: Citizen and Community Under New Labour. In: Peter Somerville and Nigel Sprigings ed. Housing and Social Policy: Contemporary Themes and Critical Perspectives[M]. London: Routledae. 2005.
  • 3Robson B, ParKinson M, Bobby M, Maclennan D. Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy[M]. London: HMSO. 1994.
  • 4Smith M, Beazley M, Progressive Regimes. Partnerships and the In Volvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation[J]. Pub lic Administration, 2000, (4): 855- 878.
  • 5Bentley T, McCarthy H, Mean M. Inside Out: RethinKing Inclusive Communities[M]. London: Demos/Bar POW Cadbury Trust, 2003.
  • 6Scottish Executive. A Power of Community Initiative: Community Planning: Political Restrictions on Council Employees [Z]. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. 2000.
  • 7Rogers S, Smith M, Sullivan H, ClarKe M. Community Planning in Scotland: An Evaluation of the Path finder Projects[Z]. Edinburgh: CoSLA, 1999.
  • 8Audit Scotland. Community Planning: An Initial Review[Z]. Edinburgh: Audit Scotland. 2006.
  • 9Local Government Association (LGA). Community Leadership and Community Planning[Z]. London: LGA publications, 1998.
  • 10DETR. Preparing Community Strategies: Government Guidance to Local Authorities[Z]. London: DETR, 2000.

共引文献174

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部