期刊文献+

因灾群体居住安置路径选择模式的国际比较研究 被引量:3

International Comparison Research on the Pattern of Affected Inhabitants’Choice of Post-disaster Resettlement
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以三个巨灾后典型受灾市镇——中国汶川地震(2008年)受灾的都江堰市、美国卡特里娜飓风(2005年)受灾的新奥尔良市、东日本地震(2011年)受灾的七浜町——的住房重建过程为研究对象,分别构建三个案例的因灾群体居住安置路径选择框架,以通常被忽视的群体视角审视住房重建规划策略对群体安置的影响,并通过"政府方的重建任务"和"受灾居民方的安置选择"两个维度分析各自的框架特点。再通过三个案例框架特点的横向比较,分析其异同、优势及问题、背后成因,为中国的灾后住房重建规划策略在减轻政府负担,完成艰巨的住房重建任务,受灾群体的安置选择更具自主性、多样性、灵活性等方面提出优化建议。 The study thoroughly compared three post-disaster cities on their decisionmaking frameworks for affected inhabitants’resettlement:Dujiangyan City in China after Wenchuan Earthquake,New Orleans in the US after Katrina Hurricane,and Shichigahama Town in Japan after the Great East Japan Earthquake.Their frameworks are mapped out from two dimensions:the"role of government"and the"choice of inhabitants".Through analyzing the similarities and differences among the three cases,as well as their strengths,weaknesses,and their underlying problems,the research concludes to propose a series of practices for post-disaster housing reconstruction planning in Chinese regions.It is expected to help coping with some crucial issues that China has faced with:the mitigation of government burdens after extremely serious disasters,and the realization of more autonomous,diverse,and flexible resettlement choices for disaster-affected inhabitants in China.
作者 郗皎如 铃木萨琪 王江波 Xi Jiaoru;Suzuki Sachi;Wang Jiangbo
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期97-105,共9页 Urban Planning International
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(52008204) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJCZH191) 日本学术振兴会基金(16J02703)资助。
关键词 灾后住房重建 居住安置路径 群体选择 国际比较研究 汶川地震 新奥尔良飓风 东日本地震 Post-disaster Housing Reconstruction Resettlement Route Affected Inhabitants’Choice International Comparison Research Wenchuan Earthquake Katrina Hurricane Great East Japan Earthquake
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献56

  • 12008年6月8日实施.《汶川地震灾后恢复重建条例》.
  • 2资料来源于日本国土交通省技术参事官望月达也2008年6月19日在河北廊坊召开的“2008城市发展与规划国际论坛”上的发言.
  • 3《兵库县的活断层-六甲·淡路岛断层带》.http://webprefihyogodp/hukkou/imdex.htm.
  • 4[日]内阁府编.《灾后恢复与重建实施手册》.中国劳动社会保障出版社,2008年8月第一版,第295页.
  • 5仇保兴.第三次城市化浪潮中的中国范例——中国快速城市化的特点、问题与对策[J].城市规划,2007,31(6):9-15. 被引量:48
  • 6Olshansky, R. B. Planning after Hurricane Katrina [J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2006, 72(2), 147 -153.
  • 7Olshansky, R. B., Johnson, L. A., & Topping, K. C. Rebuilding communities following disaster: Lessons from Kobe and Los Angeles [ J ]. Built Environment, 2006, 32 (4), 354 - 374.
  • 8Olshansky, R. , L. Johnson, et al. Planning for the rebuilding of New Orleans [ J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2008, 74(3) : 273 -287.
  • 9Quarantelli, E. L. The disaster recovery process: What we know and do not know from research [ R ]. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, 1999.
  • 10Reardon K, Green R, Bates L, & Kiely R. Overcoming the challenges of post-disaster planning in New Orleans: Lessons from the ACORN Housing/University Collaborative. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Milwaukee, WI, 2007.

共引文献30

同被引文献21

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部