科学进步的逼真性解释模型的逻辑认知难题再研究

Logical Cognitive Puzzle of“Verisimilitude”Explanation Model on the Science Progress

为了解释科学进步的问题,波普尔提出了逼真性概念,十年后,其逼真性定义因为受到蒂奇和米勒的批判而告失败,随后不断有学者提出了替代性定义模型:其一是根据内容定义模型,其二是根据相似性定义模型,以及近年来兹瓦特类比于阿罗的社会选择的不可能性定理,讨论了给出一个精制的逼真性定义模型的可能性,以打破人们在逼真性问题上陷入长久而激烈的争论的僵局.最后,应用模型选择理论以解决科学进步中的逻辑问题和认识论问题.

In order to explain the question how the science makes progress,Popper put forward the concept of verisimilitude;Ten years later,Popper'sverisimilitude definition failed because of being criticized by Tichy and Miller,then many researchers proposed alternatives;All these alternatives are either content or likeness proposals,we need a general verisimilitude definition to unify the content and likeness definitions;In recent years,analogous to Arrow'simpossibility theorem by Zwat,we discussed the possibility to give a refined definition of verisimilitude to break the long and heated debate deadlock on verisimilitude.Finally,the theory of model selection is applied to solve the problems of logic and epistemology in the progress of science.