期刊文献+

鹤岗地震台阵勘选记录信号及噪声的相关性分析 被引量:1

Correlation analysis of signal and noise of Hegang Seismic Array survey data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于2019年中国地震局"一带一路"鹤岗地震台阵勘选资料,分析了勘选测点记录的近震Pg震相和远震P波震相在时间域和频率域的相关性。时间域相关分析结果显示,鹤岗地震台阵场地对近震Pg震相和远震P波震相的最佳监测距离分别约为550 m和1570 m;频率域相干分析显示,监测远震P波信号的最佳距离约1570 m,与时间域分析结果一致;近震和远震的最佳监测距离分别对应勘选台阵最内圆和最外圆半径,可作为该台阵布局设计的依据。台阵增益分析显示,勘选台阵对于Pg和P波震相识别具有一定增强作用。 Based on the Hegang Seismic Array survey data in 2019 from the"the Belt and Road Initiatives"Seismic Network Project of China Earthquake Administration,the correlation between the Pg phase of near earthquakes and the P phase of distant earthquakes in the time domain and frequency domain is analyzed.The time-domain correlation analysis result shows that the best monitoring distances for the Pg phase and P phase are about 550 m and 1570 m,respectively.Coherence analysis in the frequency domain shows that the optimal distance for monitoring teleseismic P-wave signals is about 1570 m.The best monitoring distances for near and distant earthquakes correspond to the radius of inner and outer circles of the survey array,respectively,which can be used as a basis for the layout design of the array.The array gain analysis shows that the surveyed array has a certain enhancement effect on the recognition of Pg and P phases.
作者 常金龙 高东辉 欧阳兆国 郝春月 CHANG Jinlong;GAO Donghui;OUYANG Zhaoguo;HAO Chunyue(Heilongjiang Earthquake Agency,Harbin 150090,China;Hegang Seismic Station,Heilongjiang Province 154101,China;Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《地震地磁观测与研究》 2020年第6期38-46,共9页 Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research
基金 中国地震局地震科技星火计划(项目编号:XH190802Y)。
关键词 地震台阵 相关性分析 相干函数 seismic array correlation analysis cohereency
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献34

  • 1郝春月,郑重,郭燕平,周公威,张爽.中国数字地震台网(CDSN)和IMS/PS台阵的监测定位能力评估[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2006,27(2):56-63. 被引量:30
  • 2郝春月,郑重.信号相关性方法在西藏那曲台阵设计中的应用[J].中国地震,2006,22(1):34-42. 被引量:12
  • 3胡广书.数字信号处理--理论、算法与实现[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998..
  • 4奥本海默.数字信号处理(中译本)[M].科学出版社,1982..
  • 5楼顺天 李博菡.基于MATLAB的系统分析与设计—信号处理[M].西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,2000.65-66.
  • 6HarJes H-P. 1990. Design and siting of a new regional array in Central Europe[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 80:1 801~ 1 817.
  • 7Ingate S F, Husebye E S, Christoffersson A. 1985. Regional arrays and optimum data processing schemes[J]. Bull Seism SocAmer, 75: 1 155~1 177.
  • 8Kulhanek O. 1973. Signal and noise coherence determination for the Uppsala seismograph array station[J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 109:1 653~1 671.
  • 9Mykkeltveit S, Astebфl K, Doornbos D J, et al. 1983. Seismic array configuration optimization[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 73: 173~186.
  • 10Ringdal F, Husebye E S. 1982. Application of arrays in the detection, location, and identification of seismic events[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer , 72 : 201~224.

共引文献72

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部