期刊文献+

基于认知补偿的ROV操控系统人因失误预测方法

Human Error Prediction Method of ROV Control System Based on Cognitive Compensation
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对有缆遥控机器人(ROV)水下作业过程中人因可靠性问题,建立操作员认知模型分析操作员内在认知过程,结合认知过程和任务过程构建人因可靠性串并联系统;采用改进CREAM方法论构建认知可靠性模型,通过评估认知风险水平,确定分析环境对操作员认知行为的影响程度,最终通过某型ROV取样过程人因失误预测实例,对方法进行了应用验证。结果表明,改型ROV基本满足使用要求,但预测通信、回收、监视等模块人因失误率较高,有待进一步优化。研究成果为有缆遥控机器人设计优化、任务规划、人员培训提供理论支撑和参考。 Aiming at the problem of human reliability in the underwater operation of ROV,the cognitive model of the operator is established to analyze the internal cognitive process of the operator,and the series parallel system of human reliability is constructed by combining the cognitive process and task process.The cognitive reliability model is constructed by using the improved CREAM methodology,and the cognitive behavior of the operator in the analysis environment is determined by evaluating the cognitive risk level Finally,the method is verified by an example of human error prediction in the sampling process of a ROV.The results show that the modified ROV basically meets the requirements of use,but the human error rate of prediction communication,recovery,monitoring and other modules is high,which needs further optimization.The research results provide theoretical support and reference for the design optimization,task planning and personnel training of the cable remote control robot.
作者 于泳 张帅 吴通 YU Yong;ZHANG Shuai;WU Tong(College Middlebury,northwestern polytechnical university,Xi’an 710068,China;College of Art and Design,Changsha university of science and technology,Changsha 410114,China;College of mechanical and electrical engineering,northwest polytechnical university,Xi’an 710068,China)
出处 《机械设计与研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期154-158,共5页 Machine Design And Research
基金 陕西省重点研发计划资助项目(2018GY-034)。
关键词 有缆遥控机器人 认知可靠性和失误分析方法 事故预防 水下取样作业 人的因素 unmanned remotely operated vehicle cognitive reliability and error analysis method accident prevention underwater sampling operations human factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献33

  • 1王学敏,谢里阳,周金宇.考虑共因失效的系统可靠性模型[J].机械工程学报,2005,41(1):24-28. 被引量:20
  • 2杜伟宇,李同吉,吴庆麟.专家和新手不确定决策认知过程的比较研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(4):786-788. 被引量:7
  • 3David G Ullman.Toward the ideal mechanical engineering design support system[J].Research in Engineering Design,2002,13(2):55 -64.
  • 4Jarrod Moss,Jonathan Cagan,Kenneth Kotovsky.Learning from design experience in an agent-based system[J].Research in Engineering Design,2004,15(2):77 -92.
  • 5Cynthia J Atman,Monica E Cardella,Jennifer Turns and Robin Adams.Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes:an in-depth follow-up study[J].Design studies,2005,26(4):325 -357.
  • 6J P 戴斯,J P 纳格利尔里.认知过程的评估--智力的PASS理论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999,31-77.
  • 7Marcel V J Veenman,Marleen A Spaans.Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills[J].Learning and Individual Differences,2005,15(2),159-176.
  • 8Clive Anderson Stolt Offshore. PIPELINE INSPECTION,2005, http://www.ths.org.uk.
  • 9Fugro Survey Ltd. FUGRO ROTV INSPECTION - TheHydrographic Society, 2012, http://www.ths.org.uk.
  • 10L. Lipton. Mineral Resource Estimate,Solwara Project,Bismarck Sea, PNG, Technical Report, 2012.

共引文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部