青岛市中考地理试题与课程标准的一致性分析被引量：2

Consistency Analysis on Geography Examination Questions and Cur riculum Standards in Qingdao High School Entrance Examination

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文以2019和2020年青岛市中考地理试题为研究对象,综合采用韦伯和SEC一致性分析模式,分别从宏观和微观两个层面对试题与课程标准的一致性程度进行评价。从宏观层面来看,2019年试题与课程标准具有显著一致性,而2020年试题与课程标准的一致性程度则低于参考值;两套试题均侧重对"了解"和"理解"两个认知水平的考查,大体均低于课标要求,但也存在超标现象;两套试题突出了对"世界区域与发展""中国地理概况"和"中国区域与发展"3个内容主题的考查。从微观层面来看,与课程标准要求相比,两套试题在知识深度、知识种类和知识分布平衡性三个维度表现均良好,但在知识广度维度表现均较差。

作者杨加辉迪丽努尔·阿吉 Yang Jiahui;Dilinuer Aji

机构地区新疆师范大学地理科学与旅游学院新疆干旱区湖泊环境与资源重点实验室

出处《地理教学》北大核心 2020年第24期55-60,共6页 Geography Teaching

关键词中考课程标准一致性韦伯模式 SEC模式

分类号 G633.55 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1段戴平,李广洲,倪娟.课程一致性：方法比较、问题反思与本土化探寻[J].中国教育学刊,2015(6):73-78. 被引量：14

二级参考文献9

1WEBB N. Criteria for alignment of expectations and assess- ments in mathematics and science education[ R]. Madison,WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educa- tion Research, 1997.
2MULLIS I V S, MARTIN M O, RUDDOCK G J , et al. TIMSS20 11 Assessment Frameworks [ EB/OL ]. ( 2009 - 09 -01) [2015 -03 - 12]. http://timssandpirls, bc. edu/ timss2011/frameworks, html.
3ROTHMAN R. Imperfect matches: The alignment of stand- ards and tests [ R ]. Washington, D C : National Research Council, 2003.
4PORTER A,SMITHSON J. Defining, developing, and using curriculum indicators [ R ]. Philadelphia, PA : Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2001.
5NEWTON J, KASTEN S. Two Models for Evaluating Align- ment of State Standards and Assessments: Competing or Complementary Perspectives? [J]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2013, 44(3): 550-580.
6MARTONE A, SIRECI S. Evaluating Alignment between Curriculum,Assessment,and Instruction[ J ]. Review of Ed- ucational Research,2009, 79(4) :1332 - 1361.
7US Congress. House of Representatives improving Ameri- cans Schools Act [ M ]. Washington, D C : U S Government Printing Office, 1994:8.
8HERMAN J L, WEBB N M, ZUNIGA S A. Measurement Issues in the Alignnent of Standards and Assessments [ J ]. Applied Measurement in Education, 2007, 20 ( 1 ) : 101 - 126.
9严家丽,孔凡哲.论“课程标准—教科书—教师”关系理解的三境界[J].中国教育学刊,2014(2):39-43. 被引量：15