期刊文献+

考生能力分布与被试量对IRT等值的影响

The Influence of the Distribution and Number of Examinees on IRT Score Equating
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于项目反应理论中的LOGISTIC双参数模型研究共同题非等组设计下,考生能力分布与被试量对等值的影响。等值方法采用分别校准下的项目特征曲线法、Stocking-Lord法、Haebara法。等值结果采用等值分数标准误、等值系数标准误、共同题参数稳定性三种方法进行评价。研究结果表明,考生能力分布越接近,被试量越大,等值误差越小;且Stocking-Lord法较Haebara法的等值结果更稳定。 Based on the LOGISTIC two-parameter model of Item Response Theory(IRT),this paper studied the influence of the ability distribution of examinees and the number of subjects on the score equating under the Anchor Test Design.The method adopts the Stocking-Lord method and the Haebara method under calibration.The results were evaluated by the standard errors of the equivalent score,the standard errors of the equivalent coefficient and the stability of the parameters of the common items.The results show that the closer the examinees’ability distribution is,the larger the number of subjects is and the smaller the equivalent error is.Moreover,the Stocking-Lord method is more stable than the Haebara method.
作者 韩晓杰 任杰 Han Xiaojie;Ren Jie(Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing,100083)
出处 《考试研究》 2021年第1期58-64,共7页 Examinations Research
关键词 项目特征曲线法 等值 能力分布 被试量 Method of Item Characteristic Curve Equating Ability Distribution Number of Examinees
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1焦丽亚,辛涛.基于CTT的锚测验非等组设计中四种等值方法的比较研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(1):97-102. 被引量:11
  • 2罗照盛 494-501 494-501.经典测量理论等值的误差研究[J].心理科学,2000,23(4).
  • 3Dorans N J. Equating, concordance, and expectation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2004, 28(4): 227-246
  • 4Hanson B A, Zeng L J, Kolen M J. Standard errors of Levine linear equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993, 3: 225-237
  • 5Lord F M. The standard error of equipercentile equating. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1982, 3: 165 - 174
  • 6Liou M. Asymptotic standard error of equipercentile equating. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1995, 3:259 - 286
  • 7Parshall C G, Houghton P, Du Bose, Kromrey J D. Equating Error and Statistical Bias in Small Sample Linear Equating. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1995, 32(1 ): 37
  • 8Michaelides M P, Haertel E H. Sampling of Common Items: An Unrecognized Source of Error in Test Equating. CSE Report, 2004
  • 9Ogasawara H. Standard errors of item response theory equating/ linking by response function methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2001,25 (1): 53 - 67
  • 10Harwell M R. Analyzing the results of Monte Carlo studies in item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997, 57(2): 266 -279

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部