期刊文献+

利益相关者视阈下高职“金课”构建要素与机制探析

An analysis on constructional elements and mechanism of"Golden Courses"from the perspective of Stakeholder Theory in higher vocational colleges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于高职课程存在的问题,分析高职课程“含金量”不足的原因,将高职课程作为系统整体进行研究,提出高职“课程组织”利益相关者结构,并借鉴爱德华•弗里曼利益相关者理论及其分类方法,对影响课程质量的“课程组织”各方利益相关者进行了判定,对各利益相关方的关系形式、核心功用和目标诉求进行分析,提出高职“金课”构建要素模型,并针对其运行机制提出了相应策略。 Based on the existing problems of higher vocational courses,this paper analyzes the reasons for the deficiency of"gold content"in higher vocational courses,studies higher vocational courses as a whole system,and proposes the stakeholder structure of"curriculum organization"in higher vocational colleges.And in the view of Edward Freeman's stakeholder theory and its classification method,this paper makes judgment on the stakeholders of"curriculum organization"that affect the quality of curriculum,analyzes the relationship form,core function and goal appeal of stakeholders,puts forward the construction element model of"golden curriculum"in higher vocational colleges,and proposes corresponding strategies for its operation mechanism.
作者 柴璐璐 Chai Lulu(Quality Management Center,Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China 518127)
出处 《深圳信息职业技术学院学报》 2020年第6期59-64,74,共7页 Journal of Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology
基金 深圳信息职业技术学院课堂教学改革教育教学改革研究与实践专项(编号:2019ktjgzx20)。
关键词 利益相关者 高职院校 金课 课程组织 stakeholder higher vocational colleges Golden Courses curriculum construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献64

  • 1天野郁夫,陈武元.日本的大学评价[J].教育发展研究,2006,26(21):60-64. 被引量:12
  • 2魏小琳.后现代视野中的高校课程体系建设[J].高等教育研究,2007,28(7):90-94. 被引量:52
  • 3联合国教科文组织.学会生存-教育世界的今天和明天[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1996..
  • 4弗兰斯·范富格特.国际高等教育政策比较研究[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001.240、6、10-11.
  • 5联合国教科文组织.教育-财富蕴藏其中[M].北京:教育科学出版,1996.
  • 6Juran, Joseph M. and Godfrey, A. Blanton. Juran's Quality Handbook[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.7-9.
  • 7International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9000 [EB/OL]. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/ iso 9000.htm.
  • 8Green, D. What Is Quality in Higher Education? Concepts, Policy and Practice [A]. Green, D. What is Quality in Higher Education? [C].Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1994. 3-20.
  • 9Taylor, R. W. Changing Concept of Education [J ]. Journal of Education Research, 1986, (1).
  • 10StuffLebeam, D. L. A Depth Study of the Evaluation Requirement[J]. Theory Into Practice, 1966, (3).

共引文献3935

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部