摘要
理论上关于刑法第13条但书的出罪功能历来存在诸多聚讼,实务界虽然已经广泛认同适用但书予以出罪的做法,但由于缺少相应的实施细则和理论支撑,对但书的适用仍然缺乏统一的标准和方法。出罪标准说与可罚违法性说无法妥当处理犯罪概念与犯罪构成之间的关系,亦与我国现行立法和司法环境格格不入。但书应当被理解为注意性规定,司法的能动性要求将但书的精神融入到对犯罪构成要件的理解中,并从罪量要素、规范保护目的、保护法益等角度充分说明并论证出罪事由,从而强化司法判决的说理性。
Theoretically,there is a lot of litigation about the decriminalization function of the Article 13 of Criminal Law.Although practically there have been widely agreed apply it to the decriminalization,but due to the lack of corresponding implementation code and theoretical support,the Application is still lacking uniform standards and methods.The theory of standard of decriminalization and the theory of punishable illegality cannot properly handle the relationship between the concept of crime and the constitution of crime,and it is also incompatible with the current legislative and judicial environment in China.However,the Provision should be interpreted as a attentive provision.Judicial initiative requires that the spirit of the provision be integrated into the interpretation of the elements of crime,and that the cause of crime should be fully explained and demonstrated from the perspective of the amount of crime,the purpose of norm,and the legal interests.,Consequently to strengthen the rationality of judicial decisions.
作者
钱日彤
陈正月
QIAN Ri-tong;CHEN Zheng-yue(school of law,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510000,China)
出处
《宜春学院学报》
2020年第11期42-50,91,共10页
Journal of Yichun University
关键词
但书
出罪功能
犯罪概念
犯罪构成
Provision
decriminalization function
crime concept
crime Constitution