期刊文献+

浙江省2013-2018年城市居民结直肠癌筛查结果及成本效果分析 被引量:26

Results and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening program among urban residents in Zhejiang province,2013-2018
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的综合评价浙江省城市居民结直肠癌筛查的结果和成本效果,为结直肠癌筛查策略的优化提供参考依据。方法基于2013-2018年浙江省开展的城市癌症早诊早治项目,分析40~74岁城市居民结直肠癌筛查参与率和病变检出率,采用χ2检验比较不同组间率的差异,采用logistic回归分析其影响因素。测算以检出1例病变的成本为指标的成本效果比。结果共完成问卷调查166285名,评估为结直肠癌高危人群21975名(13.2%),其中4389名接受了结肠镜检查,依从率为20.0%,共检出结直肠癌11例(检出率为0.3%)、进展期腺瘤119例(2.7%)和非进展期腺瘤229例(5.2%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,性别、年龄、文化程度、吸烟、饮酒、类便隐血检测史、肠息肉疾病史和结直肠癌家族史与肠镜依从率显著相关;年龄、吸烟史、肠息肉病史与结直肠进展期病变(癌和进展期腺瘤)检出率有关。成本效果分析结果显示,筛查检出1例进展期病变的成本为22355.74元,其中检出1例结直肠癌的成本达264204.18元;年龄组越大,成本效果比越小;敏感性分析提示提高肠镜依从率可降低成本效果比。结论当前筛查项目有助于发现结直肠癌前病变,但结肠镜依从性相对较低,限制了筛查整体效果和经济学收益,应进一步加强高危人群肠镜检查的组织动员工作。 Objective To analyze the results and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer(CRC)screening program among Zhejiang urban residents so as to provide evidence for further optimization of CRC screening strategies.Methods Based on the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China which was conducted in Zhejiang province from 2013-2018,data related to the rates on compliance and detection through the CRC screening program among the 40-74 year-old residents were analyzed.Chi-square tests were used to compare the differences among groups,and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to explore the potential risk factors.Cost-effectiveness ratio(CER)was calculated by using the cost per lesion detected as the indicator.Results Among all the 166285 participants who completed the risk assessment questionnaire,21975(13.2%)were recognized as under the high risk of CRC and 4389(20.0%)of them received the colonoscopy.The detection rates of CRC,advanced adenoma,and non-advance adenoma were 0.3%(11 cases),2.7%(119 cases),and 5.2%(229 cases),respectively.Results from the multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that factors as age,gender,education level,smoking,drinking alcohol,previous fecal occult blood test(FOBT),polyp history,and family history of CRC were significantly associated with the compliance rate of colonoscopy while age,smoking and polyp history were significantly associated with the detection rate of advanced neoplasms(CRC and advanced adenoma).The costs were¥22355.74 Yuan for every CER advanced neoplasm detection and¥264204.18 Yuan per CRC detection,respectively.The CER decreased along with ageing.Sensitivity analysis showed that CERs were expected to decrease when the compliance rate of colonoscopy was increasing.Conclusions The current screening program seems effective in detecting the precancerous colorectal lesions,but the relatively low compliance rate of colonoscopy restricting both the diagnostic yields and economic benefits.It is necessary to improve the awareness and acceptance of colonoscopy among the high-risk CRC population.
作者 王乐 李辉章 朱陈 王悠清 周慧娟 孙校华 张美珍 金烈 杜灵彬 Wang Le;Li Huizhang;Zhu Chen;Wang Youqing;Zhou Huijuan;Sun Xiaohua;Zhang Meizhen;Jin Lie;Du Lingbin(Department of Cancer Prevention,Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)/Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hangzhou 310022,China;Hwa Mei Hospital,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Ningbo 315010,China;Kecheng District People’s Hospital of Quzhou of Zhejiang Province,Quzhou 324000,China;Zhejiang Jinhua Guangfu Hospital,Jinhua 321000,China)
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第12期2080-2086,共7页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基金 国家重大公共卫生服务项目(城市癌症早诊早治项目)。
关键词 肿瘤 结直肠 筛查 依从性 检出率 成本效果 Colorectal neoplasm Screening Compliance Detection rate Cost-effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献134

  • 1李其龙,马新源,俞玲玲,姚开颜,马万里,薛峰.大肠癌优化序贯筛查方案的应用研究[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2011,40(3):272-275. 被引量:17
  • 2陈坤,焦登鳌.人群大肠癌筛检数量化方法的应用研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1993,15(1):37-40. 被引量:15
  • 3徐富星.大肠癌研究现状[J].国际消化病杂志,2006,26(6):365-366. 被引量:56
  • 4武子涛,李世荣,范如英,苏惠,吴霞.粪便脱落细胞学与粪隐血试验联合检测在大肠癌筛查中的作用[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(18):4225-4226. 被引量:29
  • 5Miller PE, Lesko SM, Muscat JE, et al. Dietary patterns and colorectal adenoma and cancer risk:a review of the epidemiologi- cal evidence[J]. Nutrition and Cancer, 2010, 62(4):413-424.
  • 6Reedy J, Wirfait E, Hood A, et al. Comparing 3 dietary pattern methods--duster analysis,factor analysis, and index analysis-- with colorectal cancer risk:the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study0]. AmJ Epidemiol, 2010, 171(4):479--487.
  • 7Gunnarsson H, Ekholm A, Olsson LI. Ethnicity and emergency presentation of colon cancer[J]. EurJ Surg Oncol, 2015, 41(2) :270.
  • 8Yeoh KG, Ho KY, Chiu HM, et al. The Asia--Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects[J]. Gut, 2011, 60(9) :1236--1241.
  • 9Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 201211]. Ca GancerJ Clin, 2012, 62(1):10--29,.
  • 10Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidosco- py in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Ital- ian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2011, 103(17):1310-1322.

共引文献3870

同被引文献235

引证文献26

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部