摘要
目的构建医教研三位一体、综合客观和数据简便可及的学科评估指标体系,建立综合评估方法,为学科评估与定位提供参考依据。方法参考国内各类排行榜的评价指标和相关文献,采用德尔菲法、层次分析法确定指标及权重系数。结果构建了涵盖3个一级指标(医疗、教育和科研),12个二级指标和41个三级指标构成的综合学科评估指标体系,并设计运用三维笛卡尔空间坐标系,以3D模式图定位单个学科的医教研水平和同类学科群的分布情况。结论本研究确定的学科评估指标体系,具有内容精炼、综合性强、可操作性强和可推广性好等特点,对今后进一步开展学科评估具有借鉴意义。
Objective To build a comprehensive medical,teaching,and research discipline indicators system that is objective and easily accessible in data,and to develop a comprehensive evaluation method,at the same time provide referencevs for discipline evaluation and orientation.Methods Literature review was used in referring to the evaluation indicators of different ranking systems in China,Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)were applied to identify the indicators and their weight.Results A comprehensive discipline evaluation indicator system,including 3 first-level indicators,12 second-level indicators,and 41 third-level indicators,were constructed.The Cartesian coordinates allows for specifying the location of the medical,teaching,research level of certain discipline,and the distribution of relevant discipline groups in three-dimensional space.Conclusions The indicators system for discipline evaluation in this study has the characteristicvs of refinedness,comprehensiveness»operability,and applicability,providing references for the future evaluation of disciplines.
作者
张鹏俊
苗苗
彭博
于玲玲
高强
吴锁薇
王培忠
杜元太
Zhang Pengjun;Miao Miao;Peng Bo;Yu Lingling;Gao Qiang;Wu Suowei;Wang Peizhong;Du Yuantai(Beijing Hospital,National Center of Gerontology,Institute of Geriatric Medicine-Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100020,China)
出处
《中华医学科研管理杂志》
2020年第6期432-437,共6页
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基金
北京医院“科技新星”项目(BJ-2016-047)。
关键词
学科建设
指标体系
德尔菲法
层次分析法
Discipline advancement
Indicators system
Delphi method
Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)