期刊文献+

辅助诊疗类医学人工智能应用评估体系架构研究 被引量:6

Study on the Evaluation System Framework of Medical Artificial Intelligence Applications for Auxiliary Diagnosis and Treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合实际案例分析辅助诊疗类医学人工智能应用评估存在的不足,从架构、具体维度、评估流程等方面详细阐述辅助诊疗类医学人工智能应用评估体系构建,指出该体系有助于打通从技术研发向应用转化的商业闭环,促进与完善医学人工智能应用的法律法规建设。 Combined with the practical case,the paper analyzes the shortcomings of the evaluation of medical Artificial Intelligence(AI) applications for auxiliary diagnosis and treatment,expounds the building of the evaluation system of medical AI applications for auxiliary diagnosis and treatment in detail from the aspects of the framework,concrete dimensions,evaluation process,etc.,points out that the system is helpful to open up the commercial closed loop from technology research and development to application and transformation,promote and perfect the construction of laws and regulations of medical AI applications.
作者 田雪晴 汤昊宬 程龙 廖子锐 游茂 TIAN Xueqing;TANG Haocheng;CHENG Long;LIAO Zirui;YOU Mao(China National Health Development Research Center,Beijing 100044,China;Institute of Automation,Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing 100190,China;Chinese Medical Information and Big Data Association,Beijing 100037,China;Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
出处 《医学信息学杂志》 CAS 2020年第10期2-8,共7页 Journal of Medical Informatics
基金 国家重点研发计划资助基金项目“大众医疗健康医学人工智能管理服务模式”(项目编号:2018YFC0116800)。
关键词 辅助诊疗 医学人工智能 应用评估 auxiliary diagnosis and treatment medical Artificial Intelligence(AI) evaluation of application
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1Petter S, Delone W, Mclean E. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships[J]. Eur J Inform Syst, 2008, 17(3): 236-263.
  • 2Van Der Meijden M], Tange HI, Troost J, et al. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review[J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2003, 10(3): 235-243.
  • 3Golob J, FadlaUa AM, Kan IA, et al. Validation of surgical intensive care-infection registry: a medical system for intensive care unit research, quality of care improvement, and daily patient care[J]. ] Am Col1 Surg, 2008, 207(2): 164-173.
  • 4Jen WY, Chao CC. Measuring Mobile patient safety information system success: an empirical study[J]. Int l Med Inform, 2008, 77(10): 689-697.
  • 5Petter S, Fruhling A. Evaluating the success of an emergency response medical information system[J]. Int J Med Inform, 2011, 80(7): 480-489.
  • 6Yu P, Zhang Y, Gong Y, et al. Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes[J]. Int J Med Inform, 2013, 82(9): 772-788.
  • 7Yu P, Qian S, Yu H, et al. Measuring the performance of electronic health records: a case study in residential aged care in Australia[J]. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2013, 192: 1035.
  • 8Par4 G, Lepanto L, Aubry D, et al. Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2005, 21(4): 471-479.
  • 9Sicotte C, Par6 G, Bini KK, et al. Virtual organization of hospital medical imaging: a user satisfaction survey[J]. J Digit Imaging, 2010, 23(6): 689-700.
  • 10Yung-Yu S, Fulcher J, Khin TW, et al. Evaluating the implementation of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Systems from the Perspective of Health Professional[C]//USA: IEEE 8th International Conference, 2008: 589-594.

共引文献9

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部