期刊文献+

高分辨率MRI评估早期颈动脉粥样硬化患者双侧颈动脉分叉几何形态差异 被引量:5

High resolution MRI in evaluation on geometric morphologic differences of bilateral carotid bifurcation in patients with early carotid atherosclerosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用颈动脉高分辨MRI评估早期颈动脉粥样硬化患者左右侧颈动脉分叉几何形态的差异。方法对92例早期颈动脉粥样硬化患者采集颈动脉管壁高分辨MRI,观察双侧颈动脉管壁厚度及斑块分型,计算并比较左右侧颈动脉分叉几何参数的差异。结果左侧颈动脉管壁厚度[1.24(1.09,1.46) mm]与右侧[1.29(1.10,1.57) mm]差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.12,P=0.26);左右侧斑块分型差异无统计学意义(P=0.22)。左侧颈内动脉(ICA)平面角(Z=-2.69)、近端面积比(Z=-3.43)、颈总动脉(CCA)扩张面积比(Z=-2.87)、ICA_5~CCA_3弯曲度(Z=-3.17)及二维CCA弯曲度(Z=-2.14)均大于右侧(P均<0.05);左右侧颈动脉分叉角(Z=-1.23)、ICA角(Z=-8.89)差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论早期颈动脉粥样硬化患者左右侧颈动脉分叉几何结构存在显著差异,可能导致左右侧颈动脉斑块发生率不同。 Objective To investigate the differences of the left and right side carotid bifurcation geometry in patients with early carotid atherosclerosis using carotid high resolution MRI.Methods High resolution carotid vessel wall MRI of 92 patients with early carotid atherosclerosis were collected.The wall thickness and plaque types of left and right carotid arteries were analyzed,and geometric parameters of carotid bifurcation were calculated and compared between the left and the right side.Results There was no statistical difference of wall thickness between the left side[1.24(1.09,1.46)mm]and the right side[1.29(1.10,1.57)mm](Z=-1.12,P=0.26),nor of plaque types(P=0.22).The left side carotid bifurcation had larger internal carotid artery(ICA)plane angle(Z=-2.69),proximal area ratio(Z=-3.43),common carotid artery(CCA)area expansion ratio(Z=-2.87),ICA 5-CCA 3 tortuosity(Z=-3.17)and two dimensional CCA tortuosity(Z=-2.14)than the right side(all P<0.05).No significant difference of carotid bifurcation angle(Z=-1.23)nor ICA angle(Z=-8.89)was found between bilateral carotid arteries(both P>0.05).Conclusion The differences of carotid bifurcation geometry between the left and the right carotid arteries in patients with early carotid atherosclerosis might lead to different incidences of carotid arteries on the left and the right side.
作者 江培榕 薛蕴菁 赵锡海 陈振森 孙斌 杨哲婷 林若兰 段青 JIANG Peirong;XUE Yunjing;ZHAO Xihai;CHEN Zhensen;SUN Bin;YANG Zheting;LIN Ruolan;DUAN Qing(Department of Radiology,Fujian Medical University Union Hospital,Fuzhou 350001,China;Center for Biomedical Imaging Research,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;Department of Radiology,University of Washington,Seattle 98109,USA)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第12期1799-1803,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 福建省科技创新联合资金项目(2018Y9025)。
关键词 颈动脉 动脉硬化 磁共振成像 几何形态 carotid arteries arteriosclerosis magnetic resonance imaging geometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1薛蕴菁,高培毅,林燕,代成波.颈动脉分叉血液动力状态的计算流体力学初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(6):638-641. 被引量:16
  • 2Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K mortality from 235 causes of death for 2010: A systematic analysis for the Study 2010. Lancet, 2012,380(9859) et al. Global and regional 20 age groups in 1990 and Global Burden of Disease 2095-2128.
  • 3Narumi S, Sasaki M, Ohba H, et al. Predicting carotid plaque characteristics using quantitative color-coded Tl-weighted MR plaque imaging: Correlation with carotid endarterectomy sped- mens. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2014;35(4) :766-771.
  • 4Barnett H J, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. NEnglJ Med, 1998,339(20):1415-1425.
  • 5Choi YJ, Jung SC, Lee DH. Vessel wall imaging of the intracra- nial and cervical carotid arteries. J stroke, 2015,17(3) :238-255.
  • 6Saam T, UnderhilI HR, Chu B, et al. Prevalence of American Heart Association type VI carotid atherosclerotic lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging for different levels of stenosis as measured by duplex ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 51 (10) : 1014-1021.
  • 7Saito A, Sasaki M, Ogasawara K, et al. Carotid plaque signal differences among four kinds of Tl-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques: A histopathological correlation study. Neu roradiology, 2012,54(11) : 1187-1194.
  • 8Underhill HR, Hatsukami TS, Cai J, et al. A noninvasive ima- ging approach to assess plaque severity: The carotid atherosclero- sis score. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010,31(6):1068-1075.
  • 9Zhao X, Underhill HR, Zhao Q, et al, Discriminating carotid atherosclerotic lesion severity by luminal stenosis and plaque burden: A comparison utilizing high-resolution magnetic reso- nance imaging at 3. 0 Tesla. Stroke, 2011,42(2) :347-353.
  • 10Cheung HM, Moody AR, Singh N, et al. Late stage complicated atheroma in low-grade stenotic carotid disease: MR imaging de- piction-prevalence and risk factors. Radiology, 2011, 260 (3) : 841-847.

共引文献47

同被引文献29

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部