期刊文献+

释古雅 被引量:8

An Interpretation of Classic Elegance
原文传递
导出
摘要 王国维以西方美学优美和崇高二分为背景,提出了古雅范畴。但百余年来,与他的意境说或境界论相比,这一范畴并没有引起学界的足够重视。从历史看,古雅传统对中国美学史的影响具有纵贯性。尤其中唐以降,它日益占据主导地位,主要表现在诗文、书画和古器物三个领域。其中,唐人对古雅的推崇主要基于文学、经学之士试图借此重建儒家对于中国政治、文化的主导地位;宋人的古雅起于以金石证经补史,随之使器物雅赏在宋、元、明三代逐渐强化。清人的古雅则脱不了明末清初心学向实学转向的背景,后经乾嘉朴学、嘉道金石学而进入美学。清朝晚期,金石学进一步泛化为古器物学,器物认知与器物雅赏交相辉映。这一此起彼伏的复古潮流,赋予了时间和历史经验审美价值,使对中华民族人文传统的追忆和复现成为重大美学问题,从而也使古雅成为理解中国中古和近古美学精神的重要概念。 Wang Guowei put forward the category of“classic elegance(guya)”in the context of Western aesthetics’“beauty”and“sublimity.”However,for over a hundred years this category attracted much less attention from scholars than his theory of artistic conception or theory of realm.Historically,the concept of classic elegance has had a continuous influence on Chinese aesthetics.Especially since the mid-Tang,it has been increasingly dominant in the areas of poetry,painting and calligraphy,and ancient artifacts.The Tang admiration for classic elegance was mainly based on the attempts of scholars of literature and the classics to rebuild Confucian dominance in politics and culture.The Song advocacy of it started from supplementing the history of the classics with epigraphy,and this trend was strengthened through the Song,Yuan and Ming dynasties.The Qing concept of classic elegance could not resist the late Ming and early Qing turn from the school of the mind to the school of statecraft(learning of practical use to society).Subsequently the plain learning of the Qianlong-Jiaqing reigns and the epigraphic learning of the Jiaqing-Daoguang reigns took on an aesthetic character.In the late Qing,the study of epigraphy was further generalized to the study of ancient artifacts,with knowledge and appreciation of artifacts illuminating one another.The vicissitudes of the movement to return to the past endowed time and historical experience with aesthetic values that made the recalling and reappearance of the Chinese cultural tradition a major aesthetic issue.Classic elegance thus became an important concept for understanding the aesthetic spirit of China’s mid-and late-antiquity.
作者 刘成纪 Liu Chengji
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第12期40-61,200,201,共24页 Social Sciences in China
基金 国家社会科学基金艺术学重大项目“传统礼乐文明与当代文化建设研究”(17ZD03)阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1罗钢.眼睛的符号学取向——王国维“境界说”探源之一[J].中国文化研究,2006(4):63-82. 被引量:14
  • 2《王国维遗书·静安文集续编》第三册,上海:上海书店出版社,1983年,第614-615页.
  • 3康德.《判断力批判》,译文采自朱光潜.《西方美学史》,北京:人民文学出版社,2002年,第352页.
  • 4康德.《判断力批判》,朱光潜.《西方美学史》,第377页.
  • 5刘勰.《文心雕龙注》上册,范文澜注,北京:人民文学出版社,1958年,第16页.
  • 6刘勰.《文心雕龙注》下册,第505页.
  • 7唐圭璋编.《词话丛编》第四册,第3272页.
  • 8Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, Translated by E. F. J. Payne, Dover Publication, 1966, Vol. 2, pp. 430 - 431 .
  • 9唐圭璋编.《词话丛编》第二册,第1632页.
  • 10Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, Vol. 2, p. 410.

共引文献30

同被引文献130

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部