摘要
目的:研究高流量湿化吸氧(HFNC)与双水平气道正压通气(BIPAP)治疗呼吸衰竭的应用效果。方法:2018年2月-2019年10月收治呼吸衰竭患者120例,随机分为两组,各60例。A组给予HFNC治疗;B组给予BIPAP治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果:两组治疗后Apache-Ⅱ评分、OI水平均优于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组治疗后PaCO2水平较治疗前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后Apache-Ⅱ评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组治疗后OI水平升高程度优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组治疗后PaCO2水平下降程度优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组患者舒适度及耐受性评分均明显优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:两种方式均可以用于治疗呼吸衰竭患者,但HFNC更适用于Ⅰ型呼吸衰竭患者,而BIPAP更适用于Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭患者。HFNC的舒适度及耐受性好,更适用于精神紧张、焦虑及患有幽闭恐惧症等依从性差的患者。
Objective:To study the application effect of high flow humidification oxygen inhalation(HFNC)and biphasic positive airway pressure(BiPAP)in the treatment of respiratory failure.Methods:From February 2018 to October 2019,120 patients with respiratory failure were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 60 patients in each group.Group A was treated with HFNC and group B was treated with BiPAP.We compared the therapeutic effects of the two groups.Results:Apache-Ⅱscore and OI level of the two groups after treatment were better than those before treatment,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In group B,after treatment,PaCO2 level was significantly lower than that before treatment,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in Apache-Ⅱscore between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05).In group A,after treatment,the increase of OI level was better than that in group B,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In group B,after treatment,the decrease of PaCO2 level was better than that in group A,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of comfort and tolerance in group A were significantly better than those in group B,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Both methods can be used to treat patients with respiratory failure,but HFNC is more suitable for patients with type I respiratory failure,and BiPAP is more suitable for patients with type II respiratory failure.HFNC has good comfort and tolerance,and is more suitable for patients with mental stress,anxiety and claustrophobia.
作者
鲁旭
陆思静
Lu Xu;Lu Sijing(Graduate Training Base of the Central Hospital of Fushun City of Jinzhou Medical University,Liaoning Fushun 113000;The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University,Liaoning Jinzhou 121000)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2021年第2期46-47,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
呼吸衰竭
双水平气道正压通气
高流量湿化吸氧
Respiratory failure
Biphasic positive airway pressure
High flow humidification oxygen inhalation