摘要
围绕朱光潜《诗论》三个重要版本的序与跋深入分析其诗学贡献,在梳理朱光潜本意基础上对学术界种种误读加以澄清。在“中西互为体用”的比较诗学方法基础上,通过互相比较、互相阐释、互相发现,朱光潜将科学与人文、西方诗学与传统诗论完美融合起来。他在王国维“有我之境”与“无我之境”之外提出“同物之境”和“超物之境”,这并非另起炉灶,而是注入了科学分析精神,使我们更深入地理解“诗境”。诗境是情趣与意象的契合,是由主客二元到化解对立的“有差别同一”,这和传统诗话随感式的“无差别同一”不同。
We provide an in-depth analysis of Zhu Guangqian’s contribution to poetics through the prefaces and postscripts to the three main editions of his Shilun(On Poetry),clarifying various academic misinterpretations by reviewing his original intentions.On the basis of a method of comparative poetics in which“both East and West serve as both essence and function,”Zhu Guangqian achieved the perfect union of science and the humanities and of Western poetics and traditional Chinese poetics through the comparison,interpretation and discovery of East and West.In addition to Wang Guowei’s“realm of the self”and“realm of no-self,”he proposed a“realm of things”and a“realm beyond things.”Here he was not making a fresh start;rather,he was introducing the spirit of scientific analysis to give us a deeper understanding of the poetic realm.The realm of poetry conjoins emotion and imagery,from subject-object dualism to the“differentiated identity”of the dissolution of opposites.This is unlike the“undifferentiated identity”of traditional poetry,with its style of“random thoughts.”
出处
《中国社会科学评价》
2020年第4期68-75,156,共9页
China Social Science Review
基金
2017年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“朱光潜、宗白华、方东美美学思想形成与桐城文化关系研究”(17ZDA018)阶段性成果。