《南华真经义海纂微》版本及相关问题考

A Textual Research on Versions of Nanhua Zhenjing Yihai Zuanwei and Related Questions

关于褚伯秀《南华真经义海纂微》的版本,张京华认为《四库全书》本底本与《道藏》本来源不一;方勇认为二本微有差别,《四库全书》本底本来源于《道藏》本。通过详细的异文对比、分析可知,张文对二本异文存在误读,两者版本系统实际上是一致的。张京华认为《四库全书》本据以校正的“别本”不确定是否存在,通过“各依所据本”体例的考察可知,“别本”确实存在,否则不大可能形成众多异文;且“别本”应该不是某一个具体的本子,而是除《四库全书》本底本以外其他版本的统称,包括《道藏》本在内。

Regarding versions of Chu Boxiu s Nanhua Zhenjing Yihai Zuanwei,Zhang Jinghua believes that the source of Siku Quanshu version is different from the one of Daozang version,while Fang Yong thinks that there is a slight difference between the two versions,and the former version comes from the latter one.Through detailed comparison and analysis of texts with discrepancies,it can be concluded that Zhang Jinghua has misunderstood the discrepancies and the two versions actually have a same system.Zhang holds that it is uncertain whether“Bieben”on which Siku Quanshu version is based exists.But according to the research on the paradigm of“each basing on its own source”,it is sure that“Bieben”does exist,otherwise it is unlikely that there are so many discrepancies.“Bieben”is not likely to be a specific version but a collective term for other versions that includes Daozang version besides the main source of Siku Quanshu version.