关于法律教义学科学性的再认知——以基尔希曼和卡尔·拉伦茨“共识性”科学观为标准

Recognition of Scientificalness of Legal Dogmatics--On Standard of Kirchmann and Karl Larenz’s “Consistency” View of Science

随着“互联网”“大数据”“人工智能”等科技的兴起,科学技术进步给法学领域带来众多的挑战,法学科学性的问题也再次凸显。从狭义的法学,即“法律教义学”和“典范知识”的科学语义出发,通过对法学家基尔希曼与拉伦茨对于法律教义学科学性问题不同科学立场的对比,找到两者的“共识性”科学观:即作为以“客观性”和“确定性”为典范知识的科学观。并以此为“最低限度”的科学标准,分别从法律教义学的研究对象、研究方法、法学家三个大方面去讨论法律教义学具有成为科学的可能。

With the rise of science and technology such as the Internet,big data and artificial intelligence,the progress of science and technology has brought many challenges to the field of law,and the scientific problems of law have been highlighted again.Starting from the scientific semantics of the narrow sense of law,i.e.“legal dogma”and“model knowledge”,through the comparison of different scientific positions of Jurists Kirchmann and Larenz on the scientific issues of legal dogma,this study finds out their“consensus”scientific views:that is,the scientific views taking“objectivity”and“certainty”as the model knowledge.Taking this as the“minimum”scientific standard,this study discusses the possibility of legal dogmatism as a science from three aspects:research object,research method and jurists.