期刊文献+

不同手术入路对冠心病患者短期内两次应用对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤的影响 被引量:6

Impact of femoral or radial approach on acute renal injury induced by repeated contrast medium in patients with coronary heart disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨短期内2次行冠状动脉介入手术、使用对比剂的冠心病患者,不同手术入路对每次术后对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)发生的影响。方法本研究为回顾性分析,入选2010年1月至2015年1月就诊于北部战区总医院心内科的冠心病患者,筛选其中30 d内2次行介入手术(包括冠状动脉造影术及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)、接触对比剂且具有完整随访资料的患者322例。按介入手术入路分为:桡动脉组(2次介入手术入路均为桡动脉,n=235)和股动脉组(2次介入手术入路均为股动脉,n=87)。所有纳入患者均分别于术后48、72 h检测血肌酐(SCr)值。终点事件为CI-AKI,定义为排除其他病因的前提下,患者应用对比剂72 h内肾功能发生损害,SCr水平较术前升高>0.5 mg/dl(44.2μmol/L)或相对比例[(术后SCr-术前SCr)/术前SCr×100%]>25%。比较两组患者的临床特点及每次术后CI-AKI发生率,采用多因素logistic回归分析短期内2次行介入手术、使用对比剂的冠心病患者,术后发生CI-AKI的危险因素。结果股动脉组中吸烟、有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)史及STEMI患者比例及纤维蛋白原、空腹血糖、肌钙蛋白T水平高于桡动脉组(P均<0.05)。股动脉组患者的手术间隔时间长于桡动脉组(P=0.001)。股动脉组患者第1次术后CI-AKI发生率高于桡动脉组,但差异无统计学意义[18.6%(16/87)比11.9%(28/235),P=0.133]。第2次术后两组的CI-AKI发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,对于短期内2次行介入治疗手术的冠心病患者,介入手术入路并不是术后发生CI-AKI的独立危险因素(P均>0.05);STEMI(OR=2.854,95%CI 1.100~7.404,P=0.031)、利尿剂(OR=4.002,95%CI 1.470~10.893,P=0.007)是第1次术后CI-AKI发生的独立危险因素。结论短期内2次行冠状动脉介入手术、应用对比剂的冠心病患者,CI-AKI发生风险与介入手术入路无相关性。 Objective To investigate the effects of femoral approach versus radial approach on the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury(CI-AKI)in patients with coronary heart disease,who received twice contrast agents within a short interval.Methods A total of 322 patients with coronary heart disease,who admitted to the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from January 2010 to January 2015,were included in this retrospective analysis.All patients exposed to contrast agents twice within 30 days.The patients were divided into two groups according to the approach of interventional operation:radial artery group(n=235)and femoral artery group(n=87).Serum creatinine(SCr)values were detected at 48 and 72 hours post procedure.Endpoint events were CI-AKI,which was defined as SCr increased>0.5 mg/dl(44.2μmol/L)or relative ratio((postoperative SCr-preoperative SCr)/preoperative SCr×100%>25%)within 72 hours after contrast agent use after excluding other causes.Clinical characteristics and the incidence of CI-AKI were compared between the two groups,multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect the risk factors of postoperative CI-AKI in these patients.Results The proportion of smoking,PCI history,STEMI patients and levels of fibrinogen,fasting blood glucose,troponin T was significantly higher in femoral artery group than in radial artery group(all P<0.05).The interval between two procedure sessions was significantly longer in the femoral artery group than in the radial artery group(P=0.001).The incidence of CI-AKI tended to be higher in femoral artery group than in radial artery group after the first operation(18.6%(16/87)vs.11.9%(28/235),P=0.133).CI-AKI incidence after the second operation was similar between the two groups(P>0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that interventional approach was not an independent risk factor for postoperative CI-AKI in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing interventional procedures twice within 30 days(P>0.05);STEMI(OR=2.854,95%CI 1.100-7.404,P=0.031)and diuretics use(OR=4.002,95%CI 1.470-10.893,P=0.007)were independent risk factors for CI-AKI after the first operation.Conclusion There is no correlation between the risk of CI-AKI and interventional approaches in patients with coronary heart disease who undergo interventional surgery twice within 30 days.
作者 李鹏 康伊 王兆丰 顾崇怀 艾冠男 刘一飞 徐培 王效增 赵昕 韩雅玲 Li Peng;Kang Yi;Wang Zhaofeng;Gu Chonghuai;Ai Guannan;Liu Yifei;Xu Pei;Wang Xiaozeng;Zhao Xin;Han Yaling(Department of Cardiology,General Hospital of Northern Theater Command,Cardiovascular Research Institute of PLA,Shenyang 110016,China;Heart Center,First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University,Beijing 100000,China;Department of Cardiology,Anqing Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Anqing 246000,China;Wafangdian Central Hospital,Dalian 116300)
出处 《中华心血管病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第12期1053-1059,共7页 Chinese Journal of Cardiology
基金 辽宁省重点研发计划项目(2018225001) 立信扬帆优化抗栓科研基金(BJUHFCSOARF201801-05)。
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 对比剂诱导急性肾损伤 桡动脉入路 股动脉入路 Coronary artery disease Percutaneous coronary intervention Contrast-induced acute kidney injury Radial artery approach Femoral artery approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献73

  • 1王小艳.急性冠脉综合征后6个月死亡和心肌梗死的预测:前瞻性的多国观察性研究(GRACE)[J].中国处方药,2006(11):25-26. 被引量:138
  • 2中华医学会放射学分会,中国医师协会放射医师分会.对比剂使用指南(第1版).中华放射学杂志,2008,42:320-325.
  • 3Costa N. Understanding contrast media. J Infus Nurs, 2004,27: 302 -312.
  • 4Katayama H, Yamaguehi K, Kozuka T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology, 1990,175: 6214528.
  • 5van der Molen AJ, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK. Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Effect of iodinated contrast media on thyroid function in adults. Eur Radiol, 2004,14:902-907.
  • 6Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, et al. Contrast Media Safety Conmfittee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21: 2527-2541.
  • 7Sudarsky D, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy in interventional cardiology. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis, 2011,4 : 85 -99.
  • 8McCullough P. Outcomes of contrast-induced nephropathy: experience in patients undergoing cardiovascular intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006,67:335-343.
  • 9A1-Ghonaim M, Pannu N. Prevention and treatment of contrast- induced nephropathy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006, 9:4249.
  • 10Pannu N, Wiebe N, Tonelli M, et al. Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy. JAMA, 2006, 295:2765-2779.

共引文献2052

同被引文献49

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部