期刊文献+

直接抗病毒药物治疗慢性丙型肝炎的成本效用分析

Cost utility analysis of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价已在中国上市的口服直接抗病毒药物(direct-acting antiviral agents,DAAs)治疗方案与长效干扰素(peginterferon,Peg-IFN)为基础的治疗方案用于慢性丙型肝炎(chronic hepatitis C,CHC)患者的经济性。方法基于基本医疗保险支付方角度,构建Markov模型。基于文献发表的真实世界临床疗效进行meta分析,对已在中国上市的口服DAAs治疗方案与Peg-IFN为基础的治疗方案治疗CHC进行成本效用分析。结果对基因1b型,艾尔巴韦(elbasvir,EBR)/格拉瑞韦(grazoprevir,GZR)人均获得14.9394质量调整生命年(quality-adjusted life years,QALYs),人均总医疗费用为27970元,相对于其他DAAs方案最具成本效果;对基因2型,索磷布韦(sofosbuvir,SOF)/维帕他韦(velpatasvir,Vel)人均获得15.0148 QALYs,人均总医疗费用是33941元,相对于其他DAAs方案最具有成本效果;对基因3型,SOF/Vel人均获得14.9403 QALYs,人均总医疗费用是34514元,相对于其他DAAs方案最具有成本效果;对基因6型,SOF/来迪派韦(ledipasvir,LDV)人均获得14.9407 QALYs,人均总医疗费用27929元,相对于其他DAAs方案最具有成本效果。结论针对不同基因型,DAAs治疗CHC最具有成本效果的方案分别为ERB/GZR(基因1b型)、SOF/Vel(基因2、3型)和SOF/LDV(基因6型)。 Objectives To conduct economic evaluation of all oral direct-acting antiviral agents(DAAs)which have been approved and launched in China versus peginterferon(Peg-IFN)-based regimen(PR)for chronic hepatitis C(CHC).Methods A markov model was developed from basic health insurance payer perspective.The meta analysis was carried out to obtain the effectiveness of DAAs from the published real world data.Cost utility analysis was conducted for all oral DAAs regimens and PR-based regimens.Results Elbasvir(EBR)/grazoprevir(GZR)was the most cost-effective regimen for genotype(GT)1b CHC patients compared with others,which achieved 14.9394 quality-adjusted life years(QALYs)per patient with total medical expenses per patient of 27970 yuan.Sofosbuvir(SOF)/velpatasvir(Vel)was the most cost-effective regimen for GT2 CHC patients and obtained 15.0148 QALYs per patient with total cost per patient of 33941 yuan.SOF/Vel was also most cost-effective for GT3 CHC patients and had 14.9403 QALYs per patient with total cost per patient of 34514 yuan.SOF/ledipasvir(LDV)was the most cost-effective for GT6 CHC,with 14.9407 QALYs obtained and 27929 yuan of total cost per patient.Conclusion For different genotypes,the most cost effective DAAs regimens for CHC were ERB/GZR(GT1b),SOF/Vel(GT2/3)and SOF/LDV(GT6).
作者 诸思贇 陈文 ZHU Si-yun;CHEN Wen(School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China)
出处 《世界临床药物》 CAS 2020年第12期921-932,共12页 World Clinical Drug
基金 美国中华医学基金会CMB药品与经济政策协作项目(19-323)。
关键词 慢性丙型肝炎 经济学评价 直接抗病毒药物 MARKOV模型 chronic hepatitis C economic evaluation direct acting antiviral agents Markov model
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献105

  • 1Lai Wei,Jia Shang,Yuanji Ma,Xiaoyuan Xu,Yan Huang,Yujuan Guan,Zhongping Duan,Wenhong Zhang,Zhiliang Gao,Mingxiang Zhang,Jun Li,Jidong Jia,Yongfeng Yang,Xiaofeng Wen,Maorong Wang,Zhansheng Jia,Bo Ning,Yongping Chen,Yue Qi,Jie Du,Jianning Jiang,Lixin Tong,Yao Xie,Jinzi JWu.Efficacy and Safety of 12-week Interferon-based Danoprevir Regimen in Patients with Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C[J].Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology,2019,7(3):221-225. 被引量:13
  • 2Xiaoyuan Xu,Bo Feng,Yujuan Guan,Sujun Zheng,Jifang Sheng,Xingxiang Yang,Yuanji Ma,Yan Huang,Yi Kang,Xiaofeng Wen,Jun Li,Youwen Tan,Qing He,Qing Xie,Maorong Wang,Ping An,Guozhong Gong,Huimin Liu,Qin Ning,Rui Hua,Bo Ning,Wen Xie,Jiming Zhang,Wenxiang Huang,Yongfeng Yang,Minghua Lin,Yingren Zhao,Yanhong Yu,Jidong Jia,Dongliang Yang,Liang Chen,Yinong Ye,Yuemin Nan,Zuojiong Gong,Quan Zhang,Peng Hu,Fusheng Wang,Yongguo Li,Dongliang Li,Zhansheng Jia,Jinlin Hou,Chengwei Chen,Jinzi JWu,Lai Wei.Efficacy and Safety of All-oral,12-week Ravidasvir Plus Ritonavir-boosted Danoprevir and Ribavirin in Treatment-naive Noncirrhotic HCV Genotype 1 Patients:Results from a Phase 2/3 Clinical Trial in China[J].Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology,2019,7(3):213-220. 被引量:15
  • 3Mohammad Irshad,Dhananjay Singh Mankotia,Khushboo Irshad.An insight into the diagnosis and pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus infection[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(44):7896-7909. 被引量:56
  • 4丙型肝炎防治指南[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2004,20(4):197-203. 被引量:735
  • 5Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2):87-108.
  • 6International Agency for Reseawh on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012: estimated t'ancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012,2014[ EB/OL]. [ 2014-12-16]. http://globocan.iarc.fr.
  • 7.l'eii,'()M i'rkif-DM, Macle,,na,, R, et al. Cancer registration principles and methods IARC Sci Pub No.95 [ M ]. Lyon: IARC, 1991:101-107.
  • 8Parkin DM, Chert VW, Ferlay J, et al. Comparability and quality control in cancer registration. IARC Technical Report No. 19 [ J ]. l.yon: IARC, 1994:35-49.
  • 9Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry. : principles and methxls Part I1. Completeness[ J ]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45 ( 5 ) : 756-764.
  • 10Bray F, Pu'kin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cmlcer registry : principles and methods. Part 1: comparability, validity and limeliness[ J ]. Eur J Cancer, 2(108, 45(5) :747-755.

共引文献554

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部