摘要
引用文献原文对正文加以说明,是崇祯《松江府志》编修的一大特点。然而,经考辨,该志中一条《吴越备史》的引文并非原文,而应是志书编修者对当时历史的综合评论,且是一个失误的评论。总之,上海、上海镇在五代时期出现的可能性很小。
Songjiang Prefecture Annals of Chongzhen Period is featured by citing the original texts to explain its body text.However,the textual research shows that the citing from Complete Records of Wu and Yue is not from the original text,but a comprehensive comment on the history of that time by the local chronicle compilers,and a false one.In short,it is unlikely for Shanghai or Shanghai Town to emerge in the Five Dynasties.
出处
《上海地方志》
2020年第4期78-81,96,共5页
Shanghai Chronicles
关键词
上海
五代
崇祯《松江府志》
《吴越备史》
史料考辨
Shanghai
Five Dynasties
Songjiang Prefecture Annals of Chongzhen Period
Complete Records of Wu and Yue
textual research of historical materials