期刊文献+

从民间传统到现代竞技--基于嘉兴掼牛竞技身份迭新历程的考察

From folk tradition to modern sports:based on the exploration of identity upgrading of Jiaxing bullfight rodeo
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近十余年来,全国范围内非物质文化遗产保护工作的火热开展为包括民族传统体育竞技在内的诸多文化项目提供了发展契机,同时也在一定程度上冲击和改变了项目原有的形态。国家级非遗项目嘉兴掼牛便是这其中较为典型的一个例子——它在当下的寻路与发展,正是处于非遗框架的重新定义、大众的“他者化”凝视、自身身份迭新等因素相互影响的复杂过程中。通过长期的民族志观察可以发现,嘉兴掼牛与当下生活的接洽之处,实则蕴含于其不囿于“非遗”概念的传统竞技与表演属性当中。随着非遗保护政策的推进与完善,嘉兴掼牛也经历了对自己身份迭新过程的再度审视和重新认知。在众声喧哗的当下社会,把握并彰显项目固有的文化特质、寻找其自身与现代文明的接洽之处,或可成为同类传统项目较为恰适的发展路径。 In the past ten years,the nationwide protection of intangible cultural heritage has provided huge opportunities for many cultural projects,including traditional ethnic sports;on the other hand,it also impacts and changes the original forms of such projects to a certain extent.A typical example is Jiaxing bullfight rodeo,a national intangible cultural heritage.Its current path-searching and development shows the complex process of interacting with various elements,such as the redefinition of the framework of intangible cultural heritage,the public’s“other”gaze,and the loss and search of its own identity.Through the long-term ethnographic observation,it can be found that the connection between Jiaxing bullfight rodeo and current life actually lies in its traditional competitive and performative attributes,which go beyond the concept of“intangible cultural heritage”.In the hustle and bustle of today’society,it may be a suitable development path for similar traditional projects to grasp and highlight their inherent cultural features,and find the connection between the projects and modern civilization.
作者 梁珊珊 LIANG Shanshan(College of International Education,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)
出处 《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第1期22-28,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家哲学社会科学重大攻关项目“中国民俗学学科建设与理论创新研究”(16ZDA162)。
关键词 嘉兴掼牛竞技 非物质文化遗产 身份迭新 Jiaxing bullfight rodeo intangible cultural heritage identity upgrading
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献131

  • 1翁乃群.山野研究与走出山野——对中国社会文化人类学的反思[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997,20(3):21-27. 被引量:8
  • 2费孝通:“继往开来,发展中国人类学”,见荣仕星、徐杰舜主编:〈人类学本土化在中国〉,广西人民出版社,1998年,第12-14页。
  • 3库柏对源自萨伊德和后现代反思话语的本土主义民族志提出了深具洞见的批评,这种民族志假定只有本地人才能理解本地人,而且只有本地人才是评判民族志的唯一标准。见Kuper, A. 1994. Culture, Identity and the Project of a Cosmopolitan Anthropology, in Man (NS)29: 537-554.
  • 4William Adams, 1998. The Philosophical Roots of Anthropology, CSLI Publications, Leland Stanford Junior Univ..
  • 5Carol R. Ember and Melvin Ember, 1993. Anthropology, 7th Edition, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: A Simon & Schuster Company.
  • 6参看Jacob Pandian, 1985. Anthropology and the Western Tradition, Prospect Heights, Ⅲ..
  • 7乔治·马尔库斯、米开尔·费彻尔:《作为文化批评的人类学:一个人文学科的实验时代》,王铭铭、蓝达居译,三联书店,1998年,第1页。
  • 8张海洋:“文化理论轨迹”,见庄孔韶主编:〈人类学通论〉,山西教育出版社,2002年,第37页。
  • 9Anthony Cohen, ed., Belonging: Identity and Social Organization in British Rural Cultures, 1982; Anthony Cohen, ed., Symbolizing Communities: Identity and Diversity in British Cultures, 1986; Anthony Cohen, Whalsay: Symbol, Segment and Boundary in a Shetland Island Community, 1988.
  • 10Michael Herzfeld, 1987. Anthropology Through the Looking-glass: Critical Ethnology in the Margins of Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp1-27.

共引文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部