期刊文献+

循证口腔实践——如何使用文献辅助临床决策

Evidence-based Dental Practice:How to Use the Literature to Inform Clinical Decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 循证口腔实践是循证口腔医学的核心思想及主要目标。然而,长期以来循证口腔医学的发展主要集中在循证口腔研究领域,对高质量临床研究证据向临床实践的转化问题关注相对较少。目前,循证口腔实践知识、技能在我国的普及程度不高,与其有关的教育与培训仍有待加强。本文将以口腔医学文献的严格评读方法为主要内容,对循证口腔实践相关理念及注意事项做一简要介绍,以期帮助口腔医护人员更好地使用文献辅助临床决策。 Evidence-based dental practice(EBDP)is the core idea and main objective of evidence-based dentistry(EBD).However,much of the development of EBD has been in the field of evidence-based dental research,with inadequate attention paid to the translation of high-quality clinical research evidence into clinical practice.Currently,EBDP-related knowledge and skills are not widely disseminated in China,relevant education and training still need to be strengthened.In order to help dental care workers use the literature to inform their clinical decision-making,this article will provide a brief introduction to EBDP-related concepts and common pitfalls,with a main focus on the critical appraisal of dental literature.
作者 花放 HUA Fang(Center for Evidence-Based Stomatology,School and Hospital of Stomatology,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430079,China;Cochrane Oral Health,Division of Dentistry,The University of Manchester,Manchester M139PL,UK)
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第1期1-5,共5页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 武汉中青年医学骨干人才培养工程(编号:[2019]87)。
关键词 循证口腔医学 循证医疗实践 临床研究 严格评读 evidence-based dentistry evidence-based practice clinical research citical appraisal
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990.
  • 2Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al. A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet, 2009, 373: 774-779.
  • 3Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club, 2006, 144(1): A8-9.
  • 4Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 1170-1173.
  • 5Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 924-926.
  • 6Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336: 995-998.
  • 7Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336:1049-1051.
  • 8Schunemann HI, Oxman AD, Brozek l, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336:1106-1110.
  • 9Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ, 2008, 337: a744.
  • 10Brozek J, Oxman A, Scheunemann HJ. GRADEpro. [Computer program].Version 3.2 for Windows. Available at http://mcmaster. flintbox.com/technology.asp?Page53993 and http://www.cc-ims.net/ revman/gradepro. Accessed October 21, 2010.

共引文献273

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部