摘要
刑事缺席审判制度中的上诉权存在实体权限和程序设计上的不足与欠缺等问题。究其根源,主要是缺席审判制度中现有上诉权的设置难以契合其价值目标及功能需求。通过对缺席审判上诉权进行法理剖析,发现上诉权的价值体现在确保缺席审判实体正义、程序公正及保障人权三个方面,根据此价值预设,上诉权因而具备利益平衡、权利救济及纠正错误裁判三大功能。结合价值哲学和功能理论的实际场域,通过明确不同案件类型之近亲属上诉权的现实权限以及优化缺席审判上诉权的程序设计,以重构缺席审判上诉权的制度设计,从而保证刑事缺席审判制度合理运行。
There exist such problems as the deficiency of substantive authority and program design in the right of appeal in criminal trial procedure in absentia.The main reason is that the existing right of appeal in trial absentia procedure is difficult to meet its value objectives and functional requirements.Through the legal analysis of the right of appeal in trial absentia procedure,it is found that the value of the right of appeal is embodied in three aspects:ensuring substantive justice,procedural justice and safeguarding human rights in trial absentia procedure.According to this value presupposition,the right of appeal has three functions:balancing interests,relieving rights and correcting wrong judgments.Combined with the practical field of value philosophy and functional theory,the system design of the right to appeal in trial absentia procedure is reconstructed by clarifying the practical authority of the right to appeal in close relatives of different case types and optimizing the program design of the right to appeal in trial absentia procedure,thus ensuring the reasonable operation of criminal trial procedure in absentia.
作者
徐暾
XU Tun(Koguan School of Law, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)
出处
《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期105-112,共8页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基金
上海市哲学社会科学规划课题资助项目(2020BFX019)。
关键词
刑事缺席审判
上诉权
实体权限
程序设计
criminal trial procedure in absentia
right of appeal
substantive authority
procedure design