刑事缺席审判制度上诉权问题研究

Research on the Right of Appeal in Criminal Trial Procedure in Absentia

刑事缺席审判制度中的上诉权存在实体权限和程序设计上的不足与欠缺等问题。究其根源,主要是缺席审判制度中现有上诉权的设置难以契合其价值目标及功能需求。通过对缺席审判上诉权进行法理剖析,发现上诉权的价值体现在确保缺席审判实体正义、程序公正及保障人权三个方面,根据此价值预设,上诉权因而具备利益平衡、权利救济及纠正错误裁判三大功能。结合价值哲学和功能理论的实际场域,通过明确不同案件类型之近亲属上诉权的现实权限以及优化缺席审判上诉权的程序设计,以重构缺席审判上诉权的制度设计,从而保证刑事缺席审判制度合理运行。

There exist such problems as the deficiency of substantive authority and program design in the right of appeal in criminal trial procedure in absentia.The main reason is that the existing right of appeal in trial absentia procedure is difficult to meet its value objectives and functional requirements.Through the legal analysis of the right of appeal in trial absentia procedure,it is found that the value of the right of appeal is embodied in three aspects:ensuring substantive justice,procedural justice and safeguarding human rights in trial absentia procedure.According to this value presupposition,the right of appeal has three functions:balancing interests,relieving rights and correcting wrong judgments.Combined with the practical field of value philosophy and functional theory,the system design of the right to appeal in trial absentia procedure is reconstructed by clarifying the practical authority of the right to appeal in close relatives of different case types and optimizing the program design of the right to appeal in trial absentia procedure,thus ensuring the reasonable operation of criminal trial procedure in absentia.