摘要
"科学的历史学"是柯林武德整个史学思想中的一个核心概念。在柯林武德的笔下,科学的历史学是一种基于证据的推理的和有组织的知识体。科学的历史学家必须学会提问,并通过证据借助推理得出自己的答案。科学的历史学是相对于剪刀加浆糊的历史学和批判的历史学而言的一种史学方法,其主要特色在于摆脱对权威证词的依赖,实现了自律。本文试以相关文本,论述柯林武德如何通过指出剪刀加浆糊的历史学和批判的历史学的不足,进而提出并阐述科学的历史学的概念。
"Scientific history" is a core concept in Collingwood’s system of historical ideas. In his view, scientific history is a kind of inferential and organized system of knowledge based on evidence. Scientific historians have to learn to ask questions and get their own answers by inference on evidence. Compared with the scissors-and-paste history and critical history, scientific history is a new historical methodology, and its main characteristics are shaking itself out of dependence on authoritative testimony and achieving autonomy. Through a research on related texts, we can learn how Collingwood pointed out the deficiencies of scissors-and-paste history and critical history, and proposed and explained the concept of scientific history.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期105-112,共8页
Journal of Historiography
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“20世纪的历史学和历史学家”(项目编号:19ZDA235)阶段性成果。
