期刊文献+

PACG患者青白联合手术后的屈光状态及影响因素 被引量:7

Analysis of Refractive Outcome and Related Factors in PACG Patients after Phacotrabeculectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)患者行青光眼白内障联合手术后3个月的屈光状态以及相关影响因素。方法:前瞻性临床研究。选择2018年12月至2019年9月于吉林大学第二医院眼科中心行小梁切除联合白内障超声乳化摘除及人工晶状体植入术(简称青白联合术)的PACG合并白内障患者51例(51眼)。术前用药后眼压≤21 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)患者作为正常眼压组(24例),>21 mmHg作为高眼压组(27例)。所有患者术前使用AL-scan测量前房深度(ACD)、眼轴长度(AL)、角膜曲率,并通过该仪器内置的SRK-T公式预测术后屈光度。随访至术后3个月行综合验光。根据术后屈光误差(RE)将患者分为近视误差组(RE<-0.5 D)、远视误差组(RE>0.5 D)、无屈光误差组(-0.5 D≤RE≤0.5 D)。正常眼压组与高眼压组患者术后屈光误差分布比较采用卡方检验,近视误差组与远视误差组患者术前生物参数比较采用独立样本t检验,手术前后生物参数比较采用配对样本t检验。结果:正常眼压组患者术后近视误差4例(17%),远视误差3例(12%),无屈光误差17例(71%);高眼压组患者近视误差7例(26%),远视误差16例(59%),无屈光误差4例(15%)。高眼压组患者术后AL缩短程度大于正常眼压组患者,组间差异有统计学意义(t=-4.308,P<0.001)。远视误差组患者术前ACD浅于近视误差组患者,术前AL短于近视误差组患者,组间差异比较均有统计学意义(t=3.226,P=0.03;t=4.993,P<0.001);近视误差组与远视误差组间的角膜曲率差异无统计学意义(t=-1.143,P=0.263)。术后RE与术前ACD、AL均呈负相关(r=-0.32,P=0.023;r=-0.52,P<0.001),与术前角膜曲率无相关性(r=0.15,P=0.101)。结论:相对于术前眼压正常的PACG患者,术前高眼压患者青白联合术后屈光误差发生的比例更高,且大多是远视屈光误差。另外,PACG患者青白联合术后总体上存在术前ACD越浅,AL越短,术后屈光状态越倾向于远视的趋势。 Objective:To study the refractive outcome and related factors in primary angle closure glaucoma(PACG)patients 3 months after phacotrabeculectomy.Methods:This was a prospective clinical study.Fifty-one eyes of 51 patients with PACG and co-existing cataract who underwent phacotrabeculectomy at the Eye Center of the Second Hospital of Jilin University from December 2018 to September 2019 were enrolled.Patients with intraocular pressure(IOP)≤21 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)were classified as the normal IOP group and patients with IOP>21 mmHg were classified as the high IOP group.Anterior chamber depth(ACD),axial length(AL)and keratometry were measured by AL-scan,and the SRK-T formula of AL-scan software was used to calculate the intraocular lense power and predict the refractive outcome.Subjective refraction was performed at 3 months.According to postoperative refractive error(RE),the patients were divided into a myopia group(RE<-0.5 D),hyperopia group(RE>0.5 D)and no refractive error group(-0.5 D≤RE≤0.5 D).A Chi-square test was used to compare the distribution of refractive errors between the normal and high IOP groups.The preoperative biological parameters of the myopia group and hyperopia group were compared by an independent t-test,and a paired sample t-test was used to compare the biological parameters before and after surgery.Results:In the normal IOP group,there were 4 patients with myopia(17%),3 patients with hyperopia(12%),and 17 patients without refractive error(71%);in the high IOP group,there were 7 patients with myopia(26%),16 patients with hyperopia(59%),and 4 patients without refractive error(15%).The reduction of AL in patients with high IOP was greater than that in patients with normal IOP,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-4.308,P<0.001).The preoperative ACD of the hyperopia group was shallower than that of the myopia group,and the preoperative AL was shorter than that of myopia group.The difference was statistically significant(t=3.226,P=0.03;t=4.993,P<0.001).With keratometry,there was no significant difference between the two groups(t=-1.143,P=0.263).There was a negative correlation between postoperative RE and preoperative ACD and AL(r=-0.32,P=0.023;r=-0.52,P<0.001);there was no significant correlation between postoperative RE and keratometry(r=0.15,P=0.101).Conclusions:Compared with normal IOP,PACG patients with high IOP have more RE,and most of them are hyperopic RE.In addition,the shallower the ACD and the shorter the AL were,the refractive outcome of PACG patients after phacotrabeculectomy more likely tends to be hyperopia.
作者 李艳霞 李佳 赵婧 郑雅娟 Yanxia Li;Jia Li;Jing Zhao;Yajuan Zheng(Department of Glaucoma,the Eye Center of the Second Hospital of Jilin University,Changchun 130000,China)
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2020年第12期908-913,共6页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
关键词 原发性闭角型青光眼 青光眼白内障联合手术 屈光误差 生物学参数 primary angle closure glaucoma phacotrabeculectomy refractive error biological parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1赵宪孟.小梁切除术后浅前房原因分析与治疗[J].国际眼科杂志,2006,6(3):686-687. 被引量:25
  • 2Falkner-Radler CI, Benesch T, Binder S. Accuracy of preoperative biometry in vitreetomy combined with cataract surgery for patients with epiretinal membranes and maealar holes: results of a prospective controlled clinical trial [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008,34 : 1754-1760.
  • 3Su WW, Chen PY, Hsiao CH, et al. Primaryphacoemulsifieation and intraocular lens implantation for acute primary angle-closure [ J]. PLoS One.2011. 6 : e20056.
  • 4He M, Huang W, Zheng Y, eL al. Anterior chamber depth in elderly Chinese: the Liwan eye study [ J ]. Ophthahnology, 2008, 115 : 1286-1290.
  • 51,adas JG, Stark WJ. hnproving cataract surgery Refiraetive Outcomes[ J]. Ophthahnology,2011,118:1699-1700.
  • 6Olsen T, Nielsen PJ. Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by uhrasound [ J ]. Aeta Ophthahuol, 1989,67 : 101-102.
  • 7Haigis W. Pseudophakic correction factors tor optical hiometry [ J]. Graefes Arch Chin Exp Ophthalmol,2001,239 :589-598.
  • 8Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, el al. Refi'aetive outeome of cataract surgery using partial coherence intefferometry and uhrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a eummercial prototype II[ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2002,28:230-234.
  • 9Rabsilber TM, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Anterior ehamber measurements using Pentacam totaling Seheimpflug camera[ J]. J Cataract Refraet Surg,2006 ,32 :456-459.
  • 10Jivrajka RV, Shammas MC, Shammas HJ. Improving the seeond- eye refractive error in patients undergoing bilateral sequential cataract surgely[ J ]. Ophthalmology ,2012 , 119:1097-1101.

共引文献64

同被引文献71

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部