工伤疑难案件的司法批复评析

Comment on Judicial Approval of Hard Cases of Work Injury

最高人民法院就工伤疑难案件的司法批复对我国劳动行政部门的工伤认定和人民法院关于工伤认定的审判工作都具有重要的指导意义。有必要就相关批复中涉及的立法意图和法理渊源进行讨论,探讨在抢险救灾中受到伤害与“见义勇为”的区别;就受伤害者在得到民事赔偿后不宜再获得工伤保险补偿提出理由与解决之策。工伤认定在实践中有扩大化的趋势,对上下班机动车工伤认定应加以限制;超过劳动年龄者不宜再进行工伤认定。

The Supreme People’s Court has important guidance for the judicial review of hard cases of work injuries.This article discusses the legislative intentions and legal origins involved in the relevant approvals.It discusses the difference between being injured in emergency rescue and“being righteous”.it provides reasons and solutions for the injured people not to obtain compensation for work-related injury insurance after receiving civil compensation.In response to the generalization of work-related injury identification in practice,we believes that the scope of work-related injury identification for workers who are injured by motor vehicle accidents“on the way to or off the work”should be restricted;those over the legal retirement age should not be subject to work-related injury identification.