期刊文献+

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗发生慢血流或无复流现象的治疗进展 被引量:7

Treatment Progress of Slow Flow or No Reflow Phenomenon in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 冠心病是一种最常见的心血管疾病,急性心肌梗死(AMI)是其最严重类型,及时、有效地开通梗死相关血管是AMI最重要的治疗手段。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)作为目前最重要的再灌注手段之一,可迅速开通罪犯血管,恢复心肌血运。然而,成功进行PCI并不意味着心肌组织得到有效的血流灌注,可能出现慢血流或无复流现象,严重影响患者的预后,增加病死率。慢血流或无复流现象的发病机制十分复杂,可能与多种因素相关。目前临床上可通过药物及机械治疗预防和治疗慢血流或无复流。 Coronary heart disease is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases,and the acute myocardial infarction is the most serious type,for which timely and effective opening of infarct related vessels is the most important treatment.As one of the most important means of reperfusion at present,percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)can quickly open the culprit vessels and restore the myocardial blood supply.However,successful PCI does not mean that the myocardial tissue is effectively perfused,because there might be slow flow or no reflow phenomenon,which seriously affects the prognosis of the patients and increases mortality.The pathogenesis of slow flow or no reflow phenomenon is very complicated,which may be related to a variety of factors.At present,drug and mechanical therapy can be used to prevent and treat slow flow or no reflow.
作者 王秋瑶 李永东 WANG Qiuyao;LI Yongdong(Inner Mongolia Medical University,Hohhot 010110,China;Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital,Baotou 014010,China)
出处 《医学综述》 2021年第2期339-344,共6页 Medical Recapitulate
关键词 急性心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 慢血流 无复流现象 Acute myocardial infarction Percutaneous coronary intervention Slow flow No reflow phenomenon
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1周滔,杨德光,陈小芳,肖孟,潜学勤.红细胞膜胆固醇水平与非ST抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者PCI相关冠状动脉慢血流或无复流发生相关[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2015,23(4):379-383. 被引量:11
  • 2Su Q, Nyi TS, Li L. Adenosine and verapamil for no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in peoplewith acute myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015,5 : CD009503.
  • 3Zhou SS, Tian F, Chen YD, et al. Combination therapy re- duces the incidence of no-reflow after primary percutaneons coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2015,12:135 142.
  • 4Akpek M, Sahin O, Sarli B, et al. Acute Effects of Intracoro- nary tirofiban on no-reflow phenomena in patients with ST- segment elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiology, 2015,66 : 560- 567.
  • 5Huang D,Qian J,Ge L,et al. REtoration of COronary flow in patients with no-reflow after primary coronary interVEntion of acute myocardial infarction (RECOVER). Am Heart J, 2012,164:394-401.
  • 6Prati F, Di Vito L, Ramazzotti V, et al. Randomized trial of standard versus ClearWay-infused abciximab and thrombecto my in myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the COCTAIL 1] study. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown), 2013, 14 : 364-371.
  • 7Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coil Cardiol, 2014, 63 : 2088-2098.
  • 8Durante A,Camici PG. Novel insights into an "old" phenome- non: the no reflow. Int J Cardiol, 2015,187 : 273-280.
  • 9Bethke A, Halvorsen S, Bohmer E, et al. Myocardial perfusion grade predicts final infarct size and left ventricular function in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a pharmaco invasive strategy (thrombolysis and early angio- plasty). EuroIntervention, 2015,10 : 12.
  • 10Chakrabarti AK,Feeney K, Abueg C, et al. Rationale and de sign of the EMBRACE STEMI study a phase 2a, random- ized, double-blind, placebo-controlled triai to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of intravenous Bendavia on reperfusion injury in patients treated with standard therapy including primary percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J, 2013,165 : 509-514.

共引文献66

同被引文献89

引证文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部