社区规划制度化的路径探讨——基于美国纽约、韩国首尔和新加坡的比较

Discussion on the Path for Institutionalization of Community Planning: A Comparison of New York,Seoul,and Singapore

国土空间规划编制要求坚持上下结合、社会协同,完善公众参与制度。进入存量发展时期,社区参与和社区规划对于存量居住空间的长效维护和发展发挥重要作用。本文选取美国、韩国和新加坡3个已建立社区规划制度的国家为研究对象,首先重点介绍其社区规划制度化的背景、社区规划体系概况以及有关成效和问题;其次在比较中讨论其社区规划制度化路径差异,并总结三者的成功之处;最后提出中国特色的社区规划制度化路径的建议。

The compilation of national land and space planning calls for a combination of upper and lower levels social coordination as well as public participation.Community participation and community planning play vital roles in detailed planning during stock land development.This paper compares three cities that have established community planning system,introduces the background of community planning institutionalization,the general situation of community planning system,and relevant effects and problems.Then it discusses the difference of their institutionalization paths and draws on common successes.Finally,some thoughts on the path for institutionalization of community planning with Chinese characteristics are put forward.