期刊文献+

淋巴瘤患者化疗继发感染抗菌用药的药师干预研究 被引量:2

Pharmacist intervention study on antibiotics used in lymphoma patients with secondary infection caused by chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析淋巴瘤患者化疗继发感染抗菌药物的药师干预效果,评价药学人员在抗菌药物合理使用中的干预价值。方法抽取2018年1月~12月淋巴瘤化疗继发感染病例50份为非干预组,抽取2019年1月~12月淋巴瘤化疗继发感染病例55份为干预组,药学人员对临床抗菌药物使用情况进行合理干预,使用SPSS 25.0进行统计分析。结果相较于非干预组而言,干预组的碳青霉烯类、氟喹诺酮类抗感染药物的使用率明显下降,抗生素的联用率也有下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),第3代头孢菌素使用率基本持平,第4代头孢菌素使用率数值有所下降,第2代头孢使用率数值有所上升,但差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预组检出的细菌菌株数目有所下降。干预组的抗感染药物使用时间、住院时间明显下降,抗感染费用、住院费用也出现了显著的下降。结论药学人员对恶性淋巴瘤化疗继发感染抗菌药物的干预,能显著减少抗感染药物的使用量,特别是高级别抗生素的使用量,更可以减少患者住院的费用和平均住院日,取得了良好的药物学、经济学和社会学效益。 Objective To analyze the effect of pharmacist intervention of antibiotics in patients with lymphoma secondary to chemotherapy,and to evaluate the intervention value of pharmacists in the rational use of antibiotics.Methods 50 cases of secondary infection caused by chemotherapy of lymphoma from January to December 2018 were selected as non-intervention group,and 55 cases of secondary infection of lymphoma from January to December 2019 were selected as intervention group.Pharmacists made reasonable intervention on the use of clinical antibiotics,and the results were statistically analyzed by SPSS25.0.Results Compared with the non-intervention group,the use rate of carbapenem and fluoroquinolone in the intervention group decreased significantly,and the combination use rate of antibiotics also decreased(P<0.05),and use rate of the third-generation cephalosporins was almost the same,the use rate of the fourth-generation cephalosporins decreased and the use rate of the second-generation cephalosporins increased,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The number of bacterial strains detected in the intervention group decreased.In the intervention group,the use time of anti-infective drugs and hospitalization time decreased significantly,and the anti-infective cost and hospitalization cost also decreased significantly.Conclusion Pharmacists’intervention of antibiotics in chemotherapy infection of malignant lymphoma can significantly reduce the use of anti-infective drugs,especially high-grade antibiotics,as well as the hospitalization expenses and average hospitalization days of patients.Good pharmacological,economic and sociological benefits have been achieved.
作者 钱荣 倪美鑫 钱生勇 郭小红 顾翩翩 杨军军 QIAN Rong;NI Mei-xin;QIAN Sheng-yong(Department of Pharmacy,Cancer Hospital affiliated to Nantong University,Nantong 226361,China)
出处 《中国处方药》 2021年第1期67-69,共3页 Journal of China Prescription Drug
基金 2018年度南通市市级科技计划(指导性)项目(MSZ18263) 南通市药学会-常州四药医院药学科研基金资助项目(ntyx1821)。
关键词 恶性淋巴瘤 药师干预 抗菌药物 Malignant lymphoma Pharmacist intervention Antibiotics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1汪复.2005中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测结果[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2006,6(5):289-295. 被引量:284
  • 2FreifeldAG, BowEJ, SepkowitzKA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2011, 52(4):427-431. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq147.
  • 3AverbuchD, OraschC, CordonnierC, et al. European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia [J]. Haematologica, 2013, 98(12):1826-1835. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091025.
  • 4AverbuchD, CordonnierC, LivermoreDM, et al. Targeted therapy against multi-resistant bacteria in leukemic and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-4, 2011)[J]. Haematologica, 2013, 98(12):1836-1847. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091330.
  • 5ZhaiW, ZhangX, WeiJ, et al. A Prospective Observational Study of Antibiotic Therapy in Febrile Neutropenia Patients with Hematological Malignances from Multiple centers in Northeast China [J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2015, 37:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.04.015.
  • 6KernWV, MarchettiO, DrgonaL, et al. Oral antibiotics for fever in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing single daily moxifloxacin with twice daily ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid combination therapy--EORTC infectious diseases group trial XV [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(9):1149-1156. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.8109.
  • 7WunderinkRG, RelloJ, CammarataSK, et al. Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia[J]. Chest, 2003, 124(5):1789-1797.
  • 8ChaftariAM, HachemR, MulanovichV, et al. Efficacy and safety of daptomycin in the treatment of Gram-positive catheter-related bloodstream infections in cancer patients [J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2010, 36(2):182-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.03.015.
  • 9Gafter-GviliA, FraserA, PaulM, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, 1:CD004386. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004386.pub3.
  • 10RazonableRR, LitzowMR, KhaliqY, et al. Bacteremia due to viridans group Streptococci with diminished susceptibility to Levofloxacin among neutropenic patients receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2002, 34(11):1469-1474. doi: 10.1086/340352.

共引文献679

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部