四库提要易类辨正三则——兼谈诸提要间的关系及《总目》诸问题的来源

Three Investigative Items of the Zhouyi Category in Summaries of Siku QuanShu:On the Relationship Among the Summaries and the Sources of the Matters in the Zongmu

二十世纪以来大量四库文献渐次披露,四库提要的衍生过程日益清晰。都絜《易变体义》诸提要在书名和提要内容均存在问题;李衡《周易义海撮要》诸提要在版本、内容方面有问题;方闻一《大易粹言》诸提要在作者、版本、内容方面也有问题。结合其他提要可见:同一部书诸提要往往前后相承,纪昀对《四库全书总目》的修改多体现在文字润色和体例统一,在作者、版本及内容方面变动有限;同一部书诸提要的前后相承往往错综复杂而非直线传承,有些书诸提要呈现为两个系统;文渊阁《四库全书》的书前提要常有抽换复抄的情况,文溯阁、文津阁《四库全书》书前提要抽换复抄相对较少,对考察诸提要的衍生更有意义。

Many summaries of Siku QuanShu had been published in 20th century,so the derivation process of the summaries is increasingly clear.There are some matters in the summaries of Yibiantiyi,Zhouyiyihaicuoyao,and Dayicuiyan.Combined with other summaries,we can see:there are some successive relations among the summaries of the same book,Ji Yun’s revision about the Siku QuanShu Zongmu is mostly embodied in the touch up of characters and the unity of style,but had little correction in author,version and content.The summaries’succession of the same book is often complicated rather than straight-line,some book’s summaries are presented as two systems.In addition,the summaries those were put in the front of the books of Siku QuanShu in Pavilion Wenyuange were often replaced and recopied,but there were relatively few such phenomena in the summaries of Siku QuanShu in Pavilion Wensuge and Pavilion Wenjinge,so these summaries hve more meaningful to investigate the derivation of the summaries.