摘要
《四库全书荟要提要》、文津阁与文渊阁《四库全书总目提要》评判所收录春秋类典籍,多以朱子《春秋》说为据,然朱子自称五经中最不能理会的便是《春秋》①,朱子亦无春秋学专著,那么以朱子《春秋》说为标准的实质内容为何?本文试就三部提要称述,与引以为评判指标之朱子《春秋》,条理其内容,以说明编纂《四库全书》选书与形成评价的基本要项与内容,对朱子说的接受与其影响。
The Spring and Autumn Classics included in the evaluation of The Summary of Siku Quanshu Collection,Wenjin Pavilion and Wenyuan Pavilion The Summary of Siku Quanshu General Catalog are mostly based on Zhu Zi’s Chun Qiu theory,but Zhu Zi claims to be the most in the Five Classics What can’t be bothered is Chun Qiu.Zhu Zi does not have a monograph on Chun Qiu,so what is the essence of Zhu Zi’s Chun Qiu as the standard?This article attempts to describe the three synopses and Zhu Zi’s Chun Qiu,which is cited as a criterion for judging,to organize its content to explain the basic elements and content of the compilation and evaluation of the Siku Quanshu,and the acceptance of Zhu Zi’s theory.influences.
作者
宋惠如
SONG Hui-ru(Quemoy University,Kinmen 362000,China)
出处
《图书馆研究》
2020年第6期117-122,共6页
Library Research
关键词
四库全书
朱子
春秋
吕祖谦
Siku Quanshu
Zhu Xi
the Chun Qiu Classics
Lv Zu-qian