“善”自何处而来——劳、唐、罗对《易传》“道为善之源”的认识与诠释

The Source of Goodness:Lao Siguang,Tang Junyi,and Luo Guang’s Recognition and Interpretation of“the Dao is the source of shan”in the Yi zhuan

在对《易传》潜存的伦理命题——"道为善之源"的认识和诠释上,劳思光认为这一命题整体上不能成立,"道"不能作为"善"的根据。唐君毅和罗光则重对这一命题进行了哲学性的诠释。在三人的辨析与诠释中,劳思光、罗光重言"道"的外在超越性,而唐君毅认为作为"善"之根据的"道"具有内在超越性,它是宇宙秩序和价值秩序的合一。唐君毅还指出,只有以人的德行为入路,才能真正对"道为善之源"有所契会和体证。

In the understanding and interpretation of the ethical proposition potentially conceived in the Yi zhuan(Commentary on the Changes)that“the Dao is the source of goodness”,Lao Siguang(1927-2012)claimed that this proposition is untenable as a whole and Dao(Way)cannot be employed as the basis of goodness.Tang Junyi(1909-1978)and Luo Guang(1911-2004)focused on its philosophical interpretations.In their analysis and interpretation,Lao and Luo laid emphasis on the external transcendence of the Dao,while Tang Junyi believed that the Dao as the basis of“goodness”has internal transcendence,which is the unity of cosmic order and axiological order.Tang Junyi also pointed out that only if we approach this issue by human morality can we really understand and personally experience this proposition.