期刊文献+

高校体育教育专业评估指标体系构建研究 被引量:1

Research on theCconstruction of EevaluationIndex System of Physical Education Major in Colleges and Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校体育教学质量的高低,对于人才培养有着直接影响。因此,高校积极开展体育教育专业评估是提高高校体育管理、确保体育教学质量的有效途径。文章运用层次分析法,选取6项高校体育教育专业评估指标,并借助专家打分方式,通过判断矩阵、一致性检验等方法,分析各项指标对于高校体育教学的影响程度。研究发现:在6大类高校体育教育专业评估指标中,教学目标的影响力对于高校体育教学质量提升影响最大、教学投入与教师素养对于体育教学质量影响也较大。因此,高校体育教学应从教学目标、师资队伍等方面出发,建立系统专业的评估体系。 The quality of college physical education has a direct impact on the quality of personnel training.Therefore,it is an effective way to improve the management of physical education and ensure the quality of physical education.In this paper,the analytic hierarchy process is used to select six evaluation indicators of physical education major in Colleges and universities.With the help of expert scoring method,through judgment matrix,consistency test and other methods,this paper analyzes the impact of each index on college physical education teaching.The results show that:in the six categories of college physical education professional evaluation indicators,the influence of teaching objectives has the greatest impact on the improvement of college physical education quality;teaching investment and teacher quality also have a greater impact on the quality of physical education.Therefore,college physical education should set up a systematic professional evaluation system from the aspects of teaching objectives and teaching staff.
作者 刘金锋 LIU Jin-feng(School of Physical Education,Huainan Normal University,Anhui Huainan 232001,China)
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2021年第1期160-163,174,共5页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金 安徽省体育社会科学研究项目:体育产业管理专业人才培养模式的改革与实践研究(ASS2014208)。
关键词 高校体育 评估体系 体系构建 体育教学 college physical education evaluation system system construction physical education
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1王勇明,赵永清.高校教师激励机制的理论构建[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,4(4):80-84. 被引量:34
  • 2赵斌.大学生综合体育素质水平与高校体育教育发展之研究[J].今日科苑,2007(2):110-111. 被引量:1
  • 3Dooris, M. J. An Analysis of the Penn State Student Rating of Teaching Effectiveness[R]. 1997.
  • 4Course Ratings at K-State [ EB/OL ]. http://www. ksu. edu/catl/courserl. htm.
  • 5Instructional Assessment System[ EB/OL]. http://www. wash-ington. edu/oea/iasl. htm.
  • 6Haskell, R. E. Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Student Evaluation of Faculty: Galloping Polls in the 21st Century[J] . District of Columbia(ERIC No. EDO-TM-98-08), 1998.
  • 7Johnson,V.E. An A Is an A Is an A[N]. New York Times,2002-04-12.
  • 8张真弼.湖北高校扩招后确保人才培养质量[N].中国教育报,2001—03—31.
  • 9刘继安.中国高等教育紧扣质量主题[N].中国教育报,2002-04-29.
  • 10张真弼.武汉大学教学改革不拘一格[N].中国教育报,2002-01-08.

共引文献149

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部