摘要
我国诉调对接机制的建设在制度设计方面和试点工作开展方面均已取得重要进展,但从制度建设的整体来看,诉调对接机制仍存在统一领导力度不足、多方配合程度不高、强制调解现象难以杜绝、配套机制尚未完善等问题。作为多元化纠纷解决机制改革示范法院之一,海南省琼中黎族苗族自治县人民法院根据地方特色和实践经验,探索出一系列诉调对接机制的创新举措,其工作思路与实践经验对诉调对接机制建设工作具有重要借鉴意义。为摆脱诉调对接机制建设困境,可以借鉴琼中县人民法院的宝贵经验,通过设立诉调对接工作领导小组、转变法官调解工作考评机制、加强配套措施建设的手段,进一步深化诉调对接机制的改革工作,以凸显诉讼与调解对纠纷解决的重要意义。
Important progress has been made in system design and pilot work in the Combination of Litigation and Mediation in China.But from the perspective of system construction as a whole,there are still some problems,such as the lack of unified leadership,the low degree of cooperation,forced mediation,and the imperfect support⁃ing mechanism.As one of the model courts for the reform of diversified dispute resolution mechanism,Qiongzhong Li and Miao Autonomous County People’s Court according to the local characteristics and practical experience,has explored a series of innovative measures for the Combination of Litigation and Mediation.Its working ideas and practi⁃cal experience are of great significance to the construction of the Combination of Litigation and Mediation.In order to get rid of the difficulties in the Combination of Litigation and Mediation,we can learn from the valuable experi⁃ence of Qiongzhong Li and Miao Autonomous County People’s Court.By means of setting up a leading group,chang⁃ing the evaluation mechanism of judges’mediation work,and strengthening the construction of supporting measures,the reform of the mechanism will be further deepened and the significance of litigation and mediation to dispute reso⁃lution is highlighted.
作者
刘振勇
黄灵钰
符王婕妤
Liu Zhenyong;Huang Lingyu;FuWang Jieyu
出处
《南海法学》
2020年第3期27-36,共10页
The South China Sea Law Journal
关键词
诉调对接机制
强制调解
诉调对接配套机制
Complaint and Mediation docking Mechanism
Mandatory Mediation
Complaint and Mediation Dock⁃ing Mechanism