期刊文献+

GB/T 38327-2019《健康信息学中医药数据集分类》国家标准适用性评价研究 被引量:1

Study on Applicability Evaluation Based on National Standard of GB/T 38327-2019 Health Informatics-Classification of Traditional Chinese Medicine Data Sets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对GB/T38327-2019《健康信息学中医药数据集分类》国家标准(以下简称"本标准")的适用性进行评价,从用户角度探索对本标准进行评价的方法。方法本研究采用文献调查法、对比验证法等,选取6名测试人员对120个中医药数据集进行分类验证,与本标准制订人员进行一致性对比分析。结果测试人员与本标准制订人员分类平均一致率为:"创建者类型"分类代码为79.72%,"数据来源类型"分类代码为71.67%,"主题类型"分类代码为58.61%。经分析,发现可多重分类的数据集、综合性主题数据集等是造成分类不一致的关键因素。结论本标准所采用的适用性评价方法可作为分类编码类标准研制过程中的分类优化方法;本标准测试验证过程中发现的问题可作为实施过程中制定有针对性推广应用策略的依据,从而更有效地引导和方便用户应用本标准实现数据集分类著录、快捷检索,最终达到本标准有效执行之目的。 Objective To evaluate the applicability of the national standard of GB/T 38327-2019 Health Informatics-Classification of Traditional Chinese Medicine Data Sets(hereinafter referred to as“the National Standard”);To explore ways to evaluate the standard from the perspective of users.Methods In this study,6 testers were selected to classify and verify 120 TCM data sets through literature investigation method and comparative verification method,and the consistency comparison analysis was conducted with the national standard-setters.Results The average agreement rate between testers and standard-setters was 79.72%for“creator type”classification code,71.67%for“data source type”classification code,and 58.61%for“subject type”classification code.Through analysis,it was found that data sets with multiple classifications and comprehensive subject data sets were the key factors causing the inconsistencies in classification.Conclusion The applicability evaluation method used in the standard can be used as the classification optimization method in the development of the classification coding class standard.The problems found in the process of standard test verification can be used as the basis for formulating targeted promotion and application strategies in the process of standard implementation,so as to guide and facilitate users to apply the standard to achieve the classification and description of data set and fast retrieval,and finally achieve the purpose of effective implementation of the standard.
作者 刘洋 李海燕 贾李蓉 刘扬 甄思圆 孙华君 熊婕 LIU Yang;LI Hai-yan;JIA Li-rong;LIU Yang;ZHEN Si-yuan;SUN Hua-jun;XIONG Jie(China International Exchange Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine,National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100027,China;Institute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,China)
出处 《中国中医药图书情报杂志》 2021年第1期7-12,共6页 Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science for Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划项目子课题(2017YFC1703505) 中国中医科学院基本科研业务费自主选题(ZZ13-030)。
关键词 中医药数据集 分类标准 适用性评价 TCM data sets classification standard applicability evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1曹颖.企业知识管理成熟度模型[J].中国市场,2007(13):22-23. 被引量:5
  • 2GB/T7027—2002.信息分类和编码的基本原则与方法.[S].,2002..
  • 3GB/T20001.3-2002标准编写规则第3部分:信息分类编码.
  • 4GB/T10113—2003分类编码通用术语.
  • 5GB/T13745—1992学科分类与代码.
  • 6GB/T14396—2001疾病分类与代码.
  • 7GB/T15657—1995中医病汪分类与代码.
  • 8GB/T7635.1-2002全国主要产品分类与代码第1部分:可运输产品.
  • 9中国图书资料分类法编辑委员会、国家工程技术图书馆.中国图书馆资料分类法[电子资源]》(第4版).北京:万方数据电子出版社.2001.
  • 10National Library of Medicine, U.S.A. Medical Subject Headings.(http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html).

共引文献11

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部