期刊文献+

系统链服务平台:基于质量评价体系的慕课优化路径研究 被引量:1

System Chain Service Platform:Research on the Path Optimization of MOOC Based on Quality Evaluation System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的/意义】当前,国内慕课课程建设过程中普遍存在课程内容缺失、课程设计难以满足学生需求与社会需求、慕课建设缺乏足够的技术和资源支持等诸多问题。【设计/方法】依据泰勒“课程评估”的经典理论,构建了慕课课程的质量评估指标体系,并对当前国内外主要MOOC平台的高校课程进行了统计分析和比较研究。【结论/发现】要优化当前的慕课质量就要改变传统慕课仅仅是内容提供者的落后观念,围绕教学内容制作,构建从教学资源提供、问题解答、学习指导到接受效果分析以及学习成果分享的系统链服务体系,使慕课成为一个文化集成的服务平台;同时线上线下一起发力,打造知识服务的教学品牌,实现网络课程的新跃升和新发展。 [Purpose/Significance]The current domestic MOOC construction process is confronted with problems such as the lack of curriculum content,the curriculum design unable to meet the student demand and the social needs,the lack of sufficient technical support and resource support for MOOC construction,etc.[Design/Methodology]Based on Taylor’s classic theory of“course evaluation”,this paper constructs a quality evaluation system for MOOC,and conducts statistical analysis and comparative research on major MOOC platforms at home and abroad.[Findings/Conclusions]To optimize the current MOOC construction process,it is necessary to abandon the lagged concept that MOOC is merely a content provider,but rather set up a system chain service revolving around teaching content production,providing teaching resources,answering questions,learning guidance,receiving effect analysis and sharing learning results,thereby making MOOC a culturally integrated service platform.At the same time,the online and offline efforts should be made together to create a teaching brand on knowledge service,and achieve new leaps and new development of online courses.
作者 谢梅 荆聪 XIE Mei;JING Cong(University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu,611731,China)
出处 《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》 2021年第1期96-103,共8页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 四川省高教学会研究项目(SCKC2019016)。
关键词 慕课 质量评估体系 系统链服务 MOOC quality evaluation system system chain service
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献209

  • 1郑蕾.在线学习及质量评估研究[J].神州,2014(14):213-213. 被引量:2
  • 2李森.论课堂的生态本质、特征及功能[J].教育研究,2005,26(10):55-60. 被引量:158
  • 3段崇江 张建伟 王学优 滕霞.网络课程评价标准研究述评[z]..昆明:中国电教协会2002年会[C].,2002..
  • 4[6]Student Evaluation of Web - Based Instruction.Dwayne Harapnuik & T. Craig Montgomerie
  • 5[2]E-Learning Certification Standards. Lynette Gillis.www. workflow. ecc- astdinstitute. org.
  • 6[3]A Framework for Pedagogical Evaluation of virtual Learning Environments. Sandy Britain & Oleg Liber. www. jtap.ac. uk/reports/htm/jtap -041. html.
  • 7[4]Quality On The Line. The National Education Association(NEA) and Blackboard Inc.
  • 8[5]Evaluation of a Web - Based Course. Karen Moenkhaus & Robyn Rodgers. Technology & Distance Education.
  • 9教育部.国家精品课程评审指标(本科,2010)[EB/OL].http://www.jpkenet.com/new/biaoge-biaozhunxiazai/,2010.
  • 10范国睿,王加强.当代西方教育生态问题研究新进展[J].全球教育展望,2007,36(9):39-45. 被引量:35

共引文献3313

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部