期刊文献+

朱光潜与科林伍德语言表现论之比较

A Comparison between Zhu Guangqian and Collingwood’s Theories of Language Expression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自克罗齐将语言纳入美学研究以来,语言便逐渐从审美的边缘走向中心。遗憾的是,在克罗齐开启了美学领域的“语言学转向”后,被称为克罗齐美学继承人的科林伍德和推动克罗齐中国化的重要学者朱光潜,二者的语言表现论都未曾引起足够的关注。以克罗齐为“中介”,在朱光潜与科林伍德间建立一种对话关系,去探索二者语言表现论的同与异,以及构成差异的关键因素,将是非常有启发性的工作。 Since Croce incorporated language into aesthetics,language has gradually moved from the edge of aesthetics to the center.It is a pity that after Croce started the“linguistic turn”in the field of aesthetics,neither Collingwood,who is called the successor of Croce’s aesthetics,nor Zhu Guangqian,an important scholar who promoted the sinicization of Croce,has attracted enough attention.It will be very enlightening to establish a dialogue relationship between Zhu Guangqian and Collingwood with Croce as the intermediary to explore the similarities and differences between the two theories of language expression and the dominant factors that constitute the differences.
作者 刘斌 宛小平 LIU Bin;WAN Xiaoping(Department of Philosophy,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China)
机构地区 安徽大学哲学系
出处 《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第1期104-110,共7页 Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(17ZDA018)。
关键词 朱光潜 科林伍德 克罗齐 语言 表现说 艺术 Zhu Guangqian Collingwood Croce language theory of expression art
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献5

  • 1朱光潜.朱光潜美学文集[M].上海:上海文艺出版社,1984.
  • 2宛小平.方东美形上学省察.(台北)哲学与文化,2009,36(8):5-21.
  • 3朱光潜.克罗齐《关学原理》序[M]//克罗齐.美学原理.北京:外国文学出版社,1983:4.
  • 4何兆武.康德《论优美感和崇高感》序[M]//康德.论优美感和崇高感.北京:商务印书馆,2004:4.
  • 5唐君毅.《科学对中国文化之价值》[J].香港民主评论,1955.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部