期刊文献+

捷克社会民主党第三任期0〜3岁儿童照顾政策改革及启示

Research on czech social democratic party's childcare policy under the age of three in its third parliament
下载PDF
导出
摘要 转轨开始后,捷克实施家庭承担主要责任的“再家庭化”儿童照顾政策改革,0〜3岁儿童照顾服务供求失衡问题不断累积。第三次上台的捷克社会民主党以追求机会平等的价值观和社会投资的福利观为指导理念,实施“去家庭化”儿童照顾政策模式改革,颁布《儿童团体法》规范儿童照顾政策责任主体和行业准入及监管机制,减免税收,增加托育服务的供给。政策成效显著,捷克生育率及年轻女性的就业率有所增加。这些政策为我国解决托育服务供需失衡问题,有效实现“幼有所育”提供有益的外部参考. Czech has implemented the"re-family"childcare policy reform in which families bear the main responsibility since transition.The imbalance between supply and demand of childcare services for 0〜3 years old has been accumulating.The Czech Social Democratic Party,which came to power for the third time,guided by the pursuit of the value of equal opportunity and the welfare concept of social investment.The party carried out the reform of the"de-familist"childcare policy model,promulgated the"Act on Children's Group"to regulate the main body responsible for childcare policy and the mechanism of industry access and supervision,reduced and exempt taxes,and increased the supply of childcare services.The policy has achieved remarkable results,the fertility rate and employment rate of young women have increased.This provides a useful external reference for China which is also facing serious imbalance between supply and demand of nursery services.
作者 李忠华 LI Zhonghua(Mudanjiang Normal University,Mudanjiang Heilongjiang 157011,China)
出处 《未来与发展》 2021年第1期29-36,19,共9页 Future and Development
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"转轨以来波兰、匈牙利、捷克左翼政党社会政策研究(17YJC710043)" 黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学项目“东欧转轨国家幼儿照看、教育政策及启示借鉴研究(1353MSYYB031)” 校级科研团队建设专项项目“西方马克思主义的科技异化思想研究(1355TD001)”。
关键词 转轨 捷克 社会民主党 0〜3岁 儿童照顾 transition czech republic social democratic party 0〜3 years old childcare
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献82

  • 1郑丽珍.“台北市家庭发展帐户”方案的发展与储蓄成效[J].江苏社会科学,2005(2):212-216. 被引量:11
  • 2和建花.部分发达国家幼儿照看和教育体制及其新政策概述[J].学前教育研究,2007(7):111-115. 被引量:33
  • 3K. Brlar-Lawson, H. A. Lawson & C. B. Hennon, et al. , "The meaning and significance of families and threats to their well-being", in K. Briar-Lawson, H. A. Lawson & C. B. Hennon, et al. ( eds. ), Family-Centered Policies And Practices, New York : Columbia University,2001, pp. 21 - 24.
  • 4A. H. Gauthier, "Family policies in industrialized countries : Is there convergence? " Population, vol. 57,2002, pp. 447 - 474.
  • 5M. Fine & L. Weis, "Crime stories: A critical look through race, ethnicity, and gender", Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 11,1998, pp. 435 - 459.
  • 6S. L. Zimmerman, Understanding Family Policy, London : Sage Publication, 1988, p. 27 - 28.
  • 7R. Lenoir, G6nalogie de la Morale Familiale, Paris : Seuil/Liber, 2003, pp. 232 - 261.
  • 8D. S. Browning & G. G. Rodriguez, Reweaving the Social Tapestry: Toward a Public Philosophy and Policy For Families, New York: Norton,2002 ,pp. 61 -63.
  • 9R. Lenoir, GSn6alogie de la Morale Familiale.
  • 10S. Leitner, "Conservative familialism reconsidered The case of Belgium", Acta Politica, vol. 40,2005, pp. 419 - 439.

共引文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部