期刊文献+

3~6年级学生英语语言能力与兴趣的评定及干预

Evaluation and Intervention of English Language Competence and Interest of Students from Grade Three to Six
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用测量法和实验法,编制《3~6年级学生英语语言能力与兴趣评定量表》,并在此基础上针对潜能生进行英语语言能力与兴趣的教学干预,以提高其英语语言能力与兴趣水平。统计分析结果表明,量表的项目质量符合测量学的要求,信度和效度良好;干预方案实施后,实验组在能力分量表、兴趣分量表及总量表上的得分均明显高于控制组,4年级潜能生更倾向于接受游戏类和思维类的训练,6年级潜能生则更倾向于接受游戏类和情境类的训练。教师可尝试从以下方面努力,帮助英语语言能力与兴趣水平较低的学生突破短板:培养学生的语块意识,多进行开放式提问;关注逻辑连接词,培养学生的全局性视角;启发独立思考,培养学生的发散性思维。 By means of measurement and experiment,The Scale of English Language Competence and Interest of Students from Grade Three to Six is developed,and on this basis,the intervention training of English language competence and interest of potential students is carried out to improve their English language competence and interest level.The results of statistical analysis show that the quality of items in the scale meets the requirements of metrology,and the reliability and validity of the scale are good.After the implementation of the intervention program,the scores of the experimental group on the competence subscale,interest subscale and total scale are significantly higher than those of the control group.The fourth grade potential students are more inclined to accept the training of games and thinking,while the sixth grade potential students are more inclined to accept the training of games and contexts.Teachers can try to help the students with low English language competence and interest level to break through the shortcomings in the following aspects:more open questions are used to cultivate students’awareness of language blocks;logical connectives are paid attention to develop students’global perspective;divergent thinking is trained through inspiring students’independent thinking.
作者 范晓玲 李添韵 夏春娥 Fan Xiaoling;Li Tianyun;Xia Chune(不详)
出处 《教育测量与评价》 2021年第2期27-35,共9页 Educational Measurement and Evaluation
基金 湖南省教育学会“十三五”规划教育课题“3~12岁少儿学习素养测评与干预研究”(z-35)的研究成果。
关键词 英语语言能力 英语语言兴趣 教学干预 English language competence English language interest teaching intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1王宁新,张炜红,曹红燕.心理干预对小学生考试焦虑影响的实证研究[J].无锡教育学院学报,2003,23(3):51-52. 被引量:1
  • 2Polit, DF, Beck, CT. the content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Research in Nursing& Health, 2006,29,489-497.
  • 3Lynn . MR Determination and quantification of content validify [J]. Nursing Research, 1986,35(6) :382-385.
  • 4Davis, LL. 1992. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts[J]. Applied Nursing Research, 1992, 5(4): 194-197.
  • 5Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Owen, SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]. Research in Nursing &Health, 2007,30,459-467.
  • 6Grant, JS, Davis, LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development[J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20, 269-274.
  • 7Waltz, CF. Strickland, O. , & Lenz, E. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. 2005. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 20-69.
  • 8Zeidner,M.Test Anxiety:The State of the Art.NY:Plenum Press,1988:379-381.
  • 9Dendato K M,Diener D.Effectiveness of cognitive relaxation therapy and study-skills training in reducing self-reported anxiety and improving the academic performance of test anxious students.Journal of Counseling of Psychology,1986,33,131-135.
  • 10Hembree R.Correlates,Causes,effects.and treatment of test anxiety.Review of Educational Research,1988,58,47-77.

共引文献308

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部