论永嘉学派与程朱理学在“道”“法”关系问题上的认识错位——以陈傅良《唐制度纪纲》为个案

The Different Understanding on the Relation of Tao and Law Between Yongjia School and Chengzhu School

"道"与"法"的关系问题是永嘉学派与程朱理学的重要分歧,陈傅良《唐制度纪纲》一文正面披露了两派在"道"与"法"关系问题上的分歧立场,从而引起了程朱理学学者魏了翁的重视和批判。本文即以此文为个案进行分析,认为造成两派在这一问题上的分歧,既由于对"道"的不同阶段的认识错位,也关系到对"道"的不同取义。

The issue of the relationship between“Tao”and“Law”is an important difference between Yongjia school and Cheng Zhu Neo Confucianism.Chen Fuliang’s article on the system of Tang Dynasty positively reveals the different positions of the two schools on the issue of the relationship between“Tao”and“Law”,which has aroused the attention and criticism of Wei Liaoweng,a Cheng Zhu Neo Confucianism scholar.This paper takes this article as a case to analyze,and holds that the differences between the two schools on this issue are not only due to the misunderstanding of different stages of“Tao”,but also related to the different meanings of“Tao”.