期刊文献+

美欧规制大型科技企业不正当竞争行为举措简析 被引量:1

A Brief Analysis in the U.S.and European Union to Regulate Unfair Competition of Big Tech
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近几年,美欧围绕搜索引擎、社交媒体、在线零售服务等领域,聚焦垄断、侵犯数据隐私、规避税款等问题,频频对谷歌、苹果、脸书、亚马逊等科技巨头开展调查。近期,为维护消费者等利益相关方合法权益,促进市场公平竞争,美欧加紧推进立法,明确在线平台责任,加大对科技巨头规制力度。本文分析了美欧针对大型科技企业采取的相关规制举措,指出由于科技巨头商业模式复杂隐蔽,以及监管立场差异性,美欧相关规制措施成效仍有待观察。鉴于我国数字经济整体仍处于大而不强阶段,不宜照搬美欧监管模式,而应平衡规范与发展二元目标,既要加强规制,坚决反对垄断和不正当竞争行为,又应支持数字经济发展壮大,推动平台经济、共享经济平稳健康发展。 In recent years,the U.S.and Europe Union have frequently launched investigations into Amazon,Facebook,Apple,Google and other tech giants,focusing on issues such as monopoly,data privacy infringement and tax evasion in search engines,social media,online retail services and other fields.Recently,the U.S.and EU have stepped up legislation to clarify the responsibilities of online platforms and strengthen regulations on technology giants,so as to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and other stakeholders and promote fair market competition.This article analyzes the relevant regulatory measures taken by the U.S.and EU against large technology enterprises,and points out that the effectiveness of relevant regulatory measures in the U.S.and EU remain to be seen due to the complex and hidden business models of technology giants and the different regulatory positions.Considering the overall digital economy in China is still in the stage of"big but not strong",China should not copy regulatory model in the U.S.and EU,but seek balance between regulation and development.While it is necessary to consolidate the regulations in light of monopoly or inappropriate competition,supporting the development of digital economy,and promoting the steady and sustainable development of platform economy and sharing economy should also be taken into account.
作者 刘猛 陈霞 Liu Meng;Chen Xia(不详)
出处 《财政科学》 CSSCI 2021年第1期144-149,共6页 Fiscal Science
关键词 科技巨头 不正当竞争 规制 数字经济 Technology Giants Unfair Competition Regulation Digital Economy
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献23

  • 1LexisNexis 数据库之Eastman Kodak CO.v Image Technical Services,Inc.(1992)案例.
  • 2LexisNexis数据库之 Brooke Group Ltd v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp,(1993)案例.
  • 3Richard A. Posner, The Next Step in Antitrust Treatment of Restricted Distribution: Per Se Legality, 48 University of Chicago Law Review 95 (1981).
  • 4LexisNexis 数据库之 Contincntal T.V,Inc v.GTE Sylvania Inc(1977)案例.
  • 5Thmnas G. Krattenmaker and Steven C. Salop, Anticompetitive ExcLusion: Raising Rivals' Costs to Achieve Power over Price. 96 Yale Law Joumal 209(1986).
  • 6Jonathan B. Baker, Recent Developments in Economics that Challenge Chicago School Views, 58 Antitrust Law Journal 645 (1989).
  • 7Robert H. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, Basic Book Inc. Publishers (1978).
  • 8Robert H. Lande, Beyond Chicago: Will Activist Antitrust Arise Again? 39 Antitrust Bulletin (1994).
  • 9Royall M. Scan, Symposium: Post-Chicago Economics: Editor's Note, 63 AntitnLst Law Journal 445, (1995).
  • 10Michael S. Jacobs, An Essay on The Normative Foundations of Antitrust Economics,74 North Carolina Law Review 219, (1995).

共引文献36

同被引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部