期刊文献+

BHP:孤独症患者观点采择训练新方法 被引量:4

Barnes-Holmes Protocol:A New Way of Perspective Taking Training for Children with Autism
原文传递
导出
摘要 观点采择是个体社交能力的基础。关系框架理论RFT认为观点采择是一种操作性行为,其核心是包含人际、空间及时间三个维度的直证关系反应。基于RFT的评估和训练方案BHP采用多范例的方式来训练直证关系反应,从而促进观点采择。采用BHP方案训练孤独症儿童观点采择的多项研究发现,该方案能有效提升被试的观点采择能力,并有较好的维持和泛化效果,为孤独症儿童的社交能力发展奠定基础。本文通过介绍和批判性分析BHP及相关研究,为我国孤独症儿童观点采择训练提供新思路和新选择。 Perspective taking is the basis of social competency for people with Autism. According to the Relational Frame Theory(RFT), perspective taking is an operant behavior, and its core is deictic relational responding, which is comprised of relations of I-you, here-there, and now-then. Based on RFT, Barnes-Holmes protocol(BHP) is the first perspective taking protocol for accessing and training deictic relational responding with multiple exemplars. It has been used in many researches to train perspective taking of children with Autism. The results showed that it was effective to enhance the subjects’ perspective taking, and had good maintenance and generalization effect, which lays a foundation for social ability development of autistic children. This paper introduces and critically analyzes BHP and related research, aiming to provide new ideas and alternatives to perspective taking training for children with Autism in China.
作者 刘园芳 白晓宇 林凡裕 祝卓宏 李新影 LIU Yuanfang;BAI Xiaoyu;LIN Fanyu;ZHU Zhuohong;LI Xinying(Laboratory of Mental Health and Behavior Geneties(Institute of Peychology),Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing,100101;Department of Psyehology,Universily of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing,00049;Research Instiute of ALSOLIFE,Beijing,10096)
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期44-50,共7页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 中科院心理所心理健康重点实验室博士后基金项目“孤独症谱系家庭的系统心理支持及干预机制研究”(2016M01156)研究成果。
关键词 观点采择 直证关系 关系框架理论 心理理论 社交行为 perspective taking deictic frame Relational Frame Theory Theory of Mind social behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献40

  • 1沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2297
  • 2叶斯柏森.语法哲学[M].何勇等译,语文出版社,1988:465.
  • 3Bickerton,D. 1990. Language and Species [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Brown, G. 1995. Speakers, Listeners and Communication : Explorations in discourse analysis [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 5Brown,G. & G. Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis [M].CUP.
  • 6Bühler, K. 1990[1934]. Theory of Language: The representational function of language [ M ] ( D. F.Goodwin, Trans. ). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 7Chen, P. 1986. Referent introducing and tracking in Chinese narratives [ D]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
  • 8Haiman, J. 1978. Conditionalsare topics [J]. Language54: 564-589.
  • 9Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things:What categories reveal about the mind [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge:CUP.

共引文献77

同被引文献152

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部