期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人手术系统在肝胆胰外科手术中的应用体会 被引量:4

The application of Da Vinci robot operation system in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结达芬奇机器人手术系统在肝胆胰外科手术中的临床应用经验。方法回顾性分析本研究中心自2019年09月至2020年07月实施的41例机器人下肝胆胰手术的临床资料。结果共实施达芬奇机器人手术共41例(肝脏手术28例,胰十二指肠切除术13例)。28例机器人肝切除术无中转开腹,平均手术时间240±75 min,术中平均出血量310±90 ml,术中输血4例。术后腹腔出血1例,保守治疗好转;术后微胆漏2例,充分引流后自愈。术后平均带管时间3.8±1.7 d,术后平均住院时间为5.5±2.5 d,无围手术期死亡。15肝细胞癌患者术后随访未见复发、转移。13例胰十二指肠切除术中,2例中转开腹,余11例顺利完成手术,均为R0切除。平均手术时间427±125 min,平均胰肠吻合时间38±14.5 min,平均胆肠吻合时间20.5±8.5 min,术中平均出血量325±105 ml,术中出血量大于800 ml 2例,术中输血3例,术后输血2例。术后A级胰漏3例,B级胰漏2例,C级胰漏1例(术后腹腔出血,保守治疗好转)。术后平均进食水时间7.4±2.6 d,术后平均带管时间7.8±3.4 d,术后平均住院时间为15.5±4.8 d,无围手术期死亡。13例患者术后依据病理结果行化疗,随访未见复发、转移病例。结论机器人肝胆胰手术安全、有效,在腹腔镜操作困难肝段及复杂的消化道重建方面具有较大优势。 Objective To summarize the clinical application of Da Vinci robot surgical system in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.Methods The data of 41 cases underwent hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery performed by Da Vinci robot in the research center from September 2019 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Results A total of 41 cases(28 cases with liver surgery,13 cases underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy)were performed by Da Vinci robot.The average operative time in 28 cases of robotic hepatectomy was 240±75 min,the average intraoperative blood loss was 310±90 ml,and blood transfusion was performed in 4 cases.Postoperative celiac hemorrhage in 1 case was cured by conservative treatment.Postoperative microbile leakage occurred in 2 cases,but recovered after adequate drainage.The average postoperative catheter duration was 3.8±1.7 d,the average postoperative hospital stay was5.5±2.5 d,no conversion to laparotomy and no perioperative death occurred.No recurrence or metastasis was observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Among the 13 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy,2 cases were converted to laparotomy,and the remaining 11 cases were successfully completed,all of which were R0 resection.The mean operative time was 427±125 min,the mean pancreaticointestinal anastomosis was 38±14.5 min,the mean choleoenteric anastomosis was 20.5±8.5 min,the mean intraoperative blood loss was 325±105 ml,the intraoperative blood loss was more than 800 ml in 2 cases,the intraoperative blood transfusion was 3 cases,and the postoperative blood transfusion was 2 cases.There were 3 cases of grade A pancreatic leakage,2 cases of grade B pancreatic leakage and 1 case of grade C pancreatic leakage(postoperative abdominal hemorrhage,conservative treatment was improved).The average postoperative water intake time was 7.4±2.6 d,the average postoperative catheter wearing time was 7.8±3.4 d,the average postoperative hospital stay was 15.5±4.8 d,and there was no perioperative death.The patient received postoperative chemotherapy based on pathological results,and no recurrence or metastasis was found.Conclusions The robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery is safe and effective,and has more advantages in difficult laparoscopic operation in liver segments and complex digestive tract reconstruction.
作者 马志刚 孟塬 阿不都外里·阿不都如素力 依马木·阿不拉 李玉鹏 巴合提·卡力甫 田广磊 王锦国 宋巍 陈雄 MA Zhi-gang;MENG Yuan;ABUDUW AILI Abudurusuli;YIMAMU Abula;LI Yu-peng;BAHETI Kalifu;TIAN Guang-lei;WANG Jin-guo;SONG Wei;CHEN Xiong(Department of Hepaobiliny surgery,People's Hospital of Xinjing Uygur Automous Region,Urumqi,830001,China)
出处 《新疆医学》 2020年第11期1134-1138,共5页 Xinjiang Medical Journal
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院院内项目(项目编号:20190405)。
关键词 机器人手术 肝脏外科手术 胰十二指肠切除术 消化道重建 Robot surgery Liver surgery Pancreatoduodenectomy Digestive tract reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1刘荣,胡明根,周宁新,黄晓强,黄志强.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的临床应用(附5例报告)[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(4):271-273. 被引量:20
  • 2Lanfranco AR,Czstellanos AE,Desai JP,et al.Robotic surgery:a current perspective.Ann Surgery,2004,239(1):14-21.
  • 3Vidovszky TJ,Smith W,Ghosh J,et al.Robotic cholecystectomy:learning curve,advantages,and limitations.J Surg Res 2006,136(2):172-178.
  • 4Choi SB,Park JS,Kim JK,et al.Early experiences of roboticassisted laparoscopic liver resection.Yonsei Med J,2008,49(4):632-638.
  • 5Breitenstein S,Nocito A,Puhan M,et al.Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcome and cost analyses of a casematched control study.Ann Surg,2008,247(6):987-993.
  • 6Mǖller-Stich BP,Reiter MA,Wente MN,et al.Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication:short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc,2007,21(10):1800-1805.
  • 7高长青,杨明,王刚,王加利,肖苍松,李丽霞,赵悦,李佳春,周琪.全机器人不开胸房间隔缺损修补术[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2007,23(5):298-300. 被引量:51
  • 8杨红航,陈秋强.胆瘘45例治疗体会[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2002;8(6):372-373.
  • 9Sarasuat VA,Choudhuri G,sharma BC,et al. Endoscpopic management of postoperative bile leak [J].J GaStrocnterd Hepatal, 1996; 11 (2) : 145-149.
  • 10Kang CM.Is robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy superior to the laparoscopic technique?[J].Ann Surg,2015,261(6):e153-154.

共引文献21

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部